NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor

H. W. Kugel, J. P. Allain, M. G. Bell, R. E. Bell, A. Diallo, R. Ellis, S. P. Gerhardt, B. Heim, M. A. Jaworski, R. Kaita, J. Kallman, S. Kaye, B. P. Leblanc, R. Maingi, A. McLean, J. Menard, D. Mueller, R. Nygren, M. Ono, S. F. Paul & 10 others R. Raman, A. L. Roquemore, S. A. Sabbagh, H. Schneider, C. H. Skinner, V. A. Soukhanovskii, C. N. Taylor, J. R. Timberlake, M. Viola, L. Zakharov

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

NSTX 2010 experiments were conducted using a molybdenum Liquid Lithium Divertor (LLD) surface installed on the outer part of the lower divertor. This tested the effectiveness of maintaining the deuterium retention properties of a static liquid lithium surface when refreshed by lithium evaporation as an approximation to a flowing liquid lithium surface. The LLD molybdenum front face has a 45% porosity to provide sufficient wetting to spread 37 g of lithium, and to retain it in the presence of magnetic forces. Lithium Evaporators were used to deposit lithium on the LLD surface. At the beginning of discharges, the LLD lithium surface ranged from solid to liquefied depending on the amount of applied and plasma heating. Noteworthy improvements in plasma performance were obtained similar to those obtained previously with lithiated graphite, e.g., ELM-free, quiescent edge, H-modes. During these experiments with the plasma outer strike point on the LLD, the rate of deuterium retention in the LLD, as indicated by the fueling needed to achieve and maintain stable plasma conditions, was the about the same as that for solid lithium coatings on the graphite prior to the installation of the LLD, i.e., about two times that of no-lithium conditions. The role of lithium impurities in this result is discussed. Following the 2010 experimental campaign, inspection of the LLD found mechanical damage to the plate supports, and other hardware resulting from forces following plasma current disruptions. The LLD was removed, upgraded, and reinstalled. A row of molybdenum tiles was installed inboard of the LLD for 2011 experiments with both inner and outer strike points on lithiated molybdenum to allow investigation of lithium plasma facing issues encountered in the first testing of the LLD.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages1724-1731
Number of pages8
JournalFusion Engineering and Design
Volume87
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lithium
Plasmas
Liquids
Molybdenum
Experiments
Graphite
Deuterium

Keywords

  • Divertors
  • Lithium
  • Lithium divertors
  • Lithium impurities
  • Lithium plasma facing components

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Kugel, H. W., Allain, J. P., Bell, M. G., Bell, R. E., Diallo, A., Ellis, R., ... Zakharov, L. (2012). NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor. Fusion Engineering and Design, 87(10), 1724-1731. DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.010

NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor. / Kugel, H. W.; Allain, J. P.; Bell, M. G.; Bell, R. E.; Diallo, A.; Ellis, R.; Gerhardt, S. P.; Heim, B.; Jaworski, M. A.; Kaita, R.; Kallman, J.; Kaye, S.; Leblanc, B. P.; Maingi, R.; McLean, A.; Menard, J.; Mueller, D.; Nygren, R.; Ono, M.; Paul, S. F.; Raman, R.; Roquemore, A. L.; Sabbagh, S. A.; Schneider, H.; Skinner, C. H.; Soukhanovskii, V. A.; Taylor, C. N.; Timberlake, J. R.; Viola, M.; Zakharov, L.

In: Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 87, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 1724-1731.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Kugel, HW, Allain, JP, Bell, MG, Bell, RE, Diallo, A, Ellis, R, Gerhardt, SP, Heim, B, Jaworski, MA, Kaita, R, Kallman, J, Kaye, S, Leblanc, BP, Maingi, R, McLean, A, Menard, J, Mueller, D, Nygren, R, Ono, M, Paul, SF, Raman, R, Roquemore, AL, Sabbagh, SA, Schneider, H, Skinner, CH, Soukhanovskii, VA, Taylor, CN, Timberlake, JR, Viola, M & Zakharov, L 2012, 'NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor' Fusion Engineering and Design, vol 87, no. 10, pp. 1724-1731. DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.010
Kugel HW, Allain JP, Bell MG, Bell RE, Diallo A, Ellis R et al. NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor. Fusion Engineering and Design. 2012 Oct;87(10):1724-1731. Available from, DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.010
Kugel, H. W. ; Allain, J. P. ; Bell, M. G. ; Bell, R. E. ; Diallo, A. ; Ellis, R. ; Gerhardt, S. P. ; Heim, B. ; Jaworski, M. A. ; Kaita, R. ; Kallman, J. ; Kaye, S. ; Leblanc, B. P. ; Maingi, R. ; McLean, A. ; Menard, J. ; Mueller, D. ; Nygren, R. ; Ono, M. ; Paul, S. F. ; Raman, R. ; Roquemore, A. L. ; Sabbagh, S. A. ; Schneider, H. ; Skinner, C. H. ; Soukhanovskii, V. A. ; Taylor, C. N. ; Timberlake, J. R. ; Viola, M. ; Zakharov, L./ NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor. In: Fusion Engineering and Design. 2012 ; Vol. 87, No. 10. pp. 1724-1731
@article{c946f7f24f4545f18eefe4986495225b,
title = "NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor",
abstract = "NSTX 2010 experiments were conducted using a molybdenum Liquid Lithium Divertor (LLD) surface installed on the outer part of the lower divertor. This tested the effectiveness of maintaining the deuterium retention properties of a static liquid lithium surface when refreshed by lithium evaporation as an approximation to a flowing liquid lithium surface. The LLD molybdenum front face has a 45% porosity to provide sufficient wetting to spread 37 g of lithium, and to retain it in the presence of magnetic forces. Lithium Evaporators were used to deposit lithium on the LLD surface. At the beginning of discharges, the LLD lithium surface ranged from solid to liquefied depending on the amount of applied and plasma heating. Noteworthy improvements in plasma performance were obtained similar to those obtained previously with lithiated graphite, e.g., ELM-free, quiescent edge, H-modes. During these experiments with the plasma outer strike point on the LLD, the rate of deuterium retention in the LLD, as indicated by the fueling needed to achieve and maintain stable plasma conditions, was the about the same as that for solid lithium coatings on the graphite prior to the installation of the LLD, i.e., about two times that of no-lithium conditions. The role of lithium impurities in this result is discussed. Following the 2010 experimental campaign, inspection of the LLD found mechanical damage to the plate supports, and other hardware resulting from forces following plasma current disruptions. The LLD was removed, upgraded, and reinstalled. A row of molybdenum tiles was installed inboard of the LLD for 2011 experiments with both inner and outer strike points on lithiated molybdenum to allow investigation of lithium plasma facing issues encountered in the first testing of the LLD.",
keywords = "Divertors, Lithium, Lithium divertors, Lithium impurities, Lithium plasma facing components",
author = "Kugel, {H. W.} and Allain, {J. P.} and Bell, {M. G.} and Bell, {R. E.} and A. Diallo and R. Ellis and Gerhardt, {S. P.} and B. Heim and Jaworski, {M. A.} and R. Kaita and J. Kallman and S. Kaye and Leblanc, {B. P.} and R. Maingi and A. McLean and J. Menard and D. Mueller and R. Nygren and M. Ono and Paul, {S. F.} and R. Raman and Roquemore, {A. L.} and Sabbagh, {S. A.} and H. Schneider and Skinner, {C. H.} and Soukhanovskii, {V. A.} and Taylor, {C. N.} and Timberlake, {J. R.} and M. Viola and L. Zakharov",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.010",
volume = "87",
pages = "1724--1731",
journal = "Fusion Engineering and Design",
issn = "0920-3796",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - NSTX plasma operation with a Liquid Lithium Divertor

AU - Kugel,H. W.

AU - Allain,J. P.

AU - Bell,M. G.

AU - Bell,R. E.

AU - Diallo,A.

AU - Ellis,R.

AU - Gerhardt,S. P.

AU - Heim,B.

AU - Jaworski,M. A.

AU - Kaita,R.

AU - Kallman,J.

AU - Kaye,S.

AU - Leblanc,B. P.

AU - Maingi,R.

AU - McLean,A.

AU - Menard,J.

AU - Mueller,D.

AU - Nygren,R.

AU - Ono,M.

AU - Paul,S. F.

AU - Raman,R.

AU - Roquemore,A. L.

AU - Sabbagh,S. A.

AU - Schneider,H.

AU - Skinner,C. H.

AU - Soukhanovskii,V. A.

AU - Taylor,C. N.

AU - Timberlake,J. R.

AU - Viola,M.

AU - Zakharov,L.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - NSTX 2010 experiments were conducted using a molybdenum Liquid Lithium Divertor (LLD) surface installed on the outer part of the lower divertor. This tested the effectiveness of maintaining the deuterium retention properties of a static liquid lithium surface when refreshed by lithium evaporation as an approximation to a flowing liquid lithium surface. The LLD molybdenum front face has a 45% porosity to provide sufficient wetting to spread 37 g of lithium, and to retain it in the presence of magnetic forces. Lithium Evaporators were used to deposit lithium on the LLD surface. At the beginning of discharges, the LLD lithium surface ranged from solid to liquefied depending on the amount of applied and plasma heating. Noteworthy improvements in plasma performance were obtained similar to those obtained previously with lithiated graphite, e.g., ELM-free, quiescent edge, H-modes. During these experiments with the plasma outer strike point on the LLD, the rate of deuterium retention in the LLD, as indicated by the fueling needed to achieve and maintain stable plasma conditions, was the about the same as that for solid lithium coatings on the graphite prior to the installation of the LLD, i.e., about two times that of no-lithium conditions. The role of lithium impurities in this result is discussed. Following the 2010 experimental campaign, inspection of the LLD found mechanical damage to the plate supports, and other hardware resulting from forces following plasma current disruptions. The LLD was removed, upgraded, and reinstalled. A row of molybdenum tiles was installed inboard of the LLD for 2011 experiments with both inner and outer strike points on lithiated molybdenum to allow investigation of lithium plasma facing issues encountered in the first testing of the LLD.

AB - NSTX 2010 experiments were conducted using a molybdenum Liquid Lithium Divertor (LLD) surface installed on the outer part of the lower divertor. This tested the effectiveness of maintaining the deuterium retention properties of a static liquid lithium surface when refreshed by lithium evaporation as an approximation to a flowing liquid lithium surface. The LLD molybdenum front face has a 45% porosity to provide sufficient wetting to spread 37 g of lithium, and to retain it in the presence of magnetic forces. Lithium Evaporators were used to deposit lithium on the LLD surface. At the beginning of discharges, the LLD lithium surface ranged from solid to liquefied depending on the amount of applied and plasma heating. Noteworthy improvements in plasma performance were obtained similar to those obtained previously with lithiated graphite, e.g., ELM-free, quiescent edge, H-modes. During these experiments with the plasma outer strike point on the LLD, the rate of deuterium retention in the LLD, as indicated by the fueling needed to achieve and maintain stable plasma conditions, was the about the same as that for solid lithium coatings on the graphite prior to the installation of the LLD, i.e., about two times that of no-lithium conditions. The role of lithium impurities in this result is discussed. Following the 2010 experimental campaign, inspection of the LLD found mechanical damage to the plate supports, and other hardware resulting from forces following plasma current disruptions. The LLD was removed, upgraded, and reinstalled. A row of molybdenum tiles was installed inboard of the LLD for 2011 experiments with both inner and outer strike points on lithiated molybdenum to allow investigation of lithium plasma facing issues encountered in the first testing of the LLD.

KW - Divertors

KW - Lithium

KW - Lithium divertors

KW - Lithium impurities

KW - Lithium plasma facing components

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867033009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867033009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.010

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 1724

EP - 1731

JO - Fusion Engineering and Design

T2 - Fusion Engineering and Design

JF - Fusion Engineering and Design

SN - 0920-3796

IS - 10

ER -