Novel predator-prey interactions: Is resistance futile?

Jennifer E. Smith, Christopher J. Whelan, Steven J. Taylor, Michael L. Denight, Mike M. Stake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Premise: Prey species may possess inappropriate behavioural, morphological, and/or physiological responses to introduced, novel predators. Thus, introduced predators may exert strong selection on prey species. Organisms: Black-capped vireo, Vireo atricapilla, and the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Data: Behavioural response of and time-energy budget for parental vireo defence against nest predation by fire ants. Field site: Fort Hood, Texas, an 88,500-hectare US military installation. Results: Fire ants usually attacked vireo nests near midnight as parents slept. All attacked nests - whether with eggs or nestlings - failed. However, adults defended their nests vigorously. Nest defence was prolonged, with a mean duration of 7.7 ± 1.5 hours (25 times longer than that against native snake predators). Compared with brooding or incubation, nest defence is energetically expensive, depleting an estimated 59% of fat stores. Conclusions: Fire ants are effective nest predators on this low-nesting bird species. The behavioural response of vireos to this novel predator is wholly inappropriate, with no benefits and considerable costs. Besides the energetic costs, defence results in numerous bites and venomous stings. Vireos ought to abandon their nests when first attacked by fire ants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-446
Number of pages14
JournalEvolutionary Ecology Research
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes


  • Behavioural strategies
  • Invasive species
  • Life histories
  • Predator-prey
  • Solenopsis invicta
  • Vireo atricapilla

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics


Dive into the research topics of 'Novel predator-prey interactions: Is resistance futile?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this