Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information

Stephen R. Mitroff, Daniel J. Simons, Daniel T. Levin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Change blindness, the failure to detect visual changes that occur during a disruption, has increasingly been used to infer the nature of internal representations. If every change were detected, detailed representations of the world would have to be stored and accessible. However, because many changes are not detected, visual representations might not be complete, and access to them might be limited. Using change detection to infer the completeness of visual representations requires an understanding of the reasons for change blindness. This article provides empirical support for one such reason: change blindness resulting from the failure to compare retained representations of both the pre- and postchange information. Even when unaware of changes, observers still retained information about both the pre- and postchange objects on the same trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1268-1281
Number of pages14
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume66
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Access to Information
blindness
Blindness
Change Blindness
Visual Representation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Nothing compares 2 views : Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. / Mitroff, Stephen R.; Simons, Daniel J.; Levin, Daniel T.

In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 66, No. 8, 11.2004, p. 1268-1281.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{8162ae148c7f4d6c93548803b871ef9d,
title = "Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information",
abstract = "Change blindness, the failure to detect visual changes that occur during a disruption, has increasingly been used to infer the nature of internal representations. If every change were detected, detailed representations of the world would have to be stored and accessible. However, because many changes are not detected, visual representations might not be complete, and access to them might be limited. Using change detection to infer the completeness of visual representations requires an understanding of the reasons for change blindness. This article provides empirical support for one such reason: change blindness resulting from the failure to compare retained representations of both the pre- and postchange information. Even when unaware of changes, observers still retained information about both the pre- and postchange objects on the same trial.",
author = "Mitroff, {Stephen R.} and Simons, {Daniel J.} and Levin, {Daniel T.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3758/BF03194997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "1268--1281",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nothing compares 2 views

T2 - Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information

AU - Mitroff, Stephen R.

AU - Simons, Daniel J.

AU - Levin, Daniel T.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Change blindness, the failure to detect visual changes that occur during a disruption, has increasingly been used to infer the nature of internal representations. If every change were detected, detailed representations of the world would have to be stored and accessible. However, because many changes are not detected, visual representations might not be complete, and access to them might be limited. Using change detection to infer the completeness of visual representations requires an understanding of the reasons for change blindness. This article provides empirical support for one such reason: change blindness resulting from the failure to compare retained representations of both the pre- and postchange information. Even when unaware of changes, observers still retained information about both the pre- and postchange objects on the same trial.

AB - Change blindness, the failure to detect visual changes that occur during a disruption, has increasingly been used to infer the nature of internal representations. If every change were detected, detailed representations of the world would have to be stored and accessible. However, because many changes are not detected, visual representations might not be complete, and access to them might be limited. Using change detection to infer the completeness of visual representations requires an understanding of the reasons for change blindness. This article provides empirical support for one such reason: change blindness resulting from the failure to compare retained representations of both the pre- and postchange information. Even when unaware of changes, observers still retained information about both the pre- and postchange objects on the same trial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15744365565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15744365565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03194997

DO - 10.3758/BF03194997

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15813193

AN - SCOPUS:15744365565

VL - 66

SP - 1268

EP - 1281

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 8

ER -