Notes on evaluating the ecology of rehabilitation praxis

Thomas A. Schwandt, Thomas A. Schwandt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rehabilitation services are typically regarded as an intervention, delivered by a professional service provider, designed to achieve the outcome of functional improvement in the life of the client or patient The primary evaluation question is whether that intervention is an effective and efficient means to the given end of functional improvement I suggest an alternative way of thinking of both rehabilitation and evaluation: The phrase ‘ecology of rehabilitation praxis’ is used to emphasize that rehabilitation is a matter of a situated, lived, technical, moral, and political interaction of people with their environment, with each other, and with the artifacts of their environment Three conceptual tools are discussed for understanding the ecology of rehabilitation praxis: community-based practice philosophy, community of practice, and the discursive nature of a practice. When rehabilitation is conceived as ecology, and not simply a treatment, then a different way of thinking about evaluation is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-105
Number of pages13
JournalScandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Ecology
Rehabilitation
Artifacts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Notes on evaluating the ecology of rehabilitation praxis. / Schwandt, Thomas A.; Schwandt, Thomas A.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 93-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{571eaaaa81b94a5eb449a748762e1238,
title = "Notes on evaluating the ecology of rehabilitation praxis",
abstract = "Rehabilitation services are typically regarded as an intervention, delivered by a professional service provider, designed to achieve the outcome of functional improvement in the life of the client or patient The primary evaluation question is whether that intervention is an effective and efficient means to the given end of functional improvement I suggest an alternative way of thinking of both rehabilitation and evaluation: The phrase ‘ecology of rehabilitation praxis’ is used to emphasize that rehabilitation is a matter of a situated, lived, technical, moral, and political interaction of people with their environment, with each other, and with the artifacts of their environment Three conceptual tools are discussed for understanding the ecology of rehabilitation praxis: community-based practice philosophy, community of practice, and the discursive nature of a practice. When rehabilitation is conceived as ecology, and not simply a treatment, then a different way of thinking about evaluation is required.",
author = "Schwandt, {Thomas A.} and Schwandt, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15017410309512613",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "93--105",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research",
issn = "1501-7419",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis AS",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Notes on evaluating the ecology of rehabilitation praxis

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A.

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Rehabilitation services are typically regarded as an intervention, delivered by a professional service provider, designed to achieve the outcome of functional improvement in the life of the client or patient The primary evaluation question is whether that intervention is an effective and efficient means to the given end of functional improvement I suggest an alternative way of thinking of both rehabilitation and evaluation: The phrase ‘ecology of rehabilitation praxis’ is used to emphasize that rehabilitation is a matter of a situated, lived, technical, moral, and political interaction of people with their environment, with each other, and with the artifacts of their environment Three conceptual tools are discussed for understanding the ecology of rehabilitation praxis: community-based practice philosophy, community of practice, and the discursive nature of a practice. When rehabilitation is conceived as ecology, and not simply a treatment, then a different way of thinking about evaluation is required.

AB - Rehabilitation services are typically regarded as an intervention, delivered by a professional service provider, designed to achieve the outcome of functional improvement in the life of the client or patient The primary evaluation question is whether that intervention is an effective and efficient means to the given end of functional improvement I suggest an alternative way of thinking of both rehabilitation and evaluation: The phrase ‘ecology of rehabilitation praxis’ is used to emphasize that rehabilitation is a matter of a situated, lived, technical, moral, and political interaction of people with their environment, with each other, and with the artifacts of their environment Three conceptual tools are discussed for understanding the ecology of rehabilitation praxis: community-based practice philosophy, community of practice, and the discursive nature of a practice. When rehabilitation is conceived as ecology, and not simply a treatment, then a different way of thinking about evaluation is required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023936191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023936191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15017410309512613

DO - 10.1080/15017410309512613

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85023936191

VL - 5

SP - 93

EP - 105

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

SN - 1501-7419

IS - 1

ER -