NON-ARTICLE III ADJUDICATION: BANKRUPTCY AND NONBANKRUPTCY, WITH AND WITHOUT LITIGANT CONSENT.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif with the non-Article III adjudications. Topics discussed include Wellness's implications for the constitutionality of non-Article III bankruptcy adjudications, determination of constitutional basis for bankruptcy judges in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Stern v. Marshall and limits of the adjudicatory powers of non- Article III referees.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-90
Number of pages80
JournalEmory Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Volume33
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

bankruptcy
Supreme Court
referee
constitutionality
court decision

Keywords

  • Wellness International Network Ltd. v. Sharif (Supreme Court case)
  • Bankruptcy jurisdiction
  • Bankruptcy
  • Bankruptcy -- United States
  • Stern v. Marshall (Supreme Court case)

Cite this

NON-ARTICLE III ADJUDICATION : BANKRUPTCY AND NONBANKRUPTCY, WITH AND WITHOUT LITIGANT CONSENT. / Brubaker, Ralph.

In: Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.07.2016, p. 11-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c2b39fa4f10341f5833ed949ee18e629,
title = "NON-ARTICLE III ADJUDICATION: BANKRUPTCY AND NONBANKRUPTCY, WITH AND WITHOUT LITIGANT CONSENT.",
abstract = "The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif with the non-Article III adjudications. Topics discussed include Wellness's implications for the constitutionality of non-Article III bankruptcy adjudications, determination of constitutional basis for bankruptcy judges in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Stern v. Marshall and limits of the adjudicatory powers of non- Article III referees.",
keywords = "Wellness International Network Ltd. v. Sharif (Supreme Court case), Bankruptcy jurisdiction, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy -- United States, Stern v. Marshall (Supreme Court case)",
author = "Ralph Brubaker",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "11--90",
journal = "Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal",
issn = "0890-7862",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - NON-ARTICLE III ADJUDICATION

T2 - BANKRUPTCY AND NONBANKRUPTCY, WITH AND WITHOUT LITIGANT CONSENT.

AU - Brubaker, Ralph

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif with the non-Article III adjudications. Topics discussed include Wellness's implications for the constitutionality of non-Article III bankruptcy adjudications, determination of constitutional basis for bankruptcy judges in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Stern v. Marshall and limits of the adjudicatory powers of non- Article III referees.

AB - The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif with the non-Article III adjudications. Topics discussed include Wellness's implications for the constitutionality of non-Article III bankruptcy adjudications, determination of constitutional basis for bankruptcy judges in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Stern v. Marshall and limits of the adjudicatory powers of non- Article III referees.

KW - Wellness International Network Ltd. v. Sharif (Supreme Court case)

KW - Bankruptcy jurisdiction

KW - Bankruptcy

KW - Bankruptcy -- United States

KW - Stern v. Marshall (Supreme Court case)

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 11

EP - 90

JO - Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

JF - Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

SN - 0890-7862

IS - 1

ER -