Abstract
The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif with the non-Article III adjudications. Topics discussed include Wellness's implications for the constitutionality of non-Article III bankruptcy adjudications, determination of constitutional basis for bankruptcy judges in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Stern v. Marshall and limits of the adjudicatory powers of non- Article III referees.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-90 |
| Number of pages | 80 |
| Journal | Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Wellness International Network Ltd. v. Sharif (Supreme Court case)
- Bankruptcy jurisdiction
- Bankruptcy
- Bankruptcy -- United States
- Stern v. Marshall (Supreme Court case)