The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif with the non-Article III adjudications. Topics discussed include Wellness's implications for the constitutionality of non-Article III bankruptcy adjudications, determination of constitutional basis for bankruptcy judges in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Stern v. Marshall and limits of the adjudicatory powers of non- Article III referees.
|Number of pages
|Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal
|Published - Jul 1 2016
- Wellness International Network Ltd. v. Sharif (Supreme Court case)
- Bankruptcy jurisdiction
- Bankruptcy -- United States
- Stern v. Marshall (Supreme Court case)