Next Steps in Wearable Technology and Community Ambulation in Multiple Sclerosis

Mikaela L. Frechette, Brett M. Meyer, Lindsey J. Tulipani, Reed D. Gurchiek, Ryan S. McGinnis, Jacob J Sosnoff

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Walking impairments are highly prevalent in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and are associated with reduced quality of life. Walking is traditionally quantified with various measures, including patient self-reports, clinical rating scales, performance measures, and advanced lab-based movement analysis techniques. Yet, the majority of these measures do not fully characterize walking (i.e., gait quality) nor adequately reflect walking in the real world (i.e., community ambulation) and have limited timescale (only measure walking at a single point in time). We discuss the potential of wearable sensors to provide sensitive, objective, and easy-to-use assessment of community ambulation in PwMS. Recent Findings: Wearable technology has the ability to measure all aspects of gait in PwMS yet is under-studied in comparison with other populations (e.g., older adults). Within the studies focusing on PwMS, half that measure pace collected free-living data, while only one study explored gait variability in free-living conditions. No studies explore gait asymmetry or complexity in free-living conditions. Summary: Wearable technology has the ability to provide objective, comprehensive, and sensitive measures of gait in PwMS. Future research should investigate this technology’s ability to accurately assess free-living measures of gait quality, specifically gait asymmetry and complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number80
JournalCurrent Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

Gait
Multiple Sclerosis
Walking
Technology
Social Conditions
Self Report
Quality of Life
Population

Keywords

  • Community ambulation
  • Gait
  • Gait quality
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Wearable technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Next Steps in Wearable Technology and Community Ambulation in Multiple Sclerosis. / Frechette, Mikaela L.; Meyer, Brett M.; Tulipani, Lindsey J.; Gurchiek, Reed D.; McGinnis, Ryan S.; Sosnoff, Jacob J.

In: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, Vol. 19, No. 10, 80, 01.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Frechette, Mikaela L. ; Meyer, Brett M. ; Tulipani, Lindsey J. ; Gurchiek, Reed D. ; McGinnis, Ryan S. ; Sosnoff, Jacob J. / Next Steps in Wearable Technology and Community Ambulation in Multiple Sclerosis. In: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 10.
@article{93164f9ee87047eabc495f44ba0958db,
title = "Next Steps in Wearable Technology and Community Ambulation in Multiple Sclerosis",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: Walking impairments are highly prevalent in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and are associated with reduced quality of life. Walking is traditionally quantified with various measures, including patient self-reports, clinical rating scales, performance measures, and advanced lab-based movement analysis techniques. Yet, the majority of these measures do not fully characterize walking (i.e., gait quality) nor adequately reflect walking in the real world (i.e., community ambulation) and have limited timescale (only measure walking at a single point in time). We discuss the potential of wearable sensors to provide sensitive, objective, and easy-to-use assessment of community ambulation in PwMS. Recent Findings: Wearable technology has the ability to measure all aspects of gait in PwMS yet is under-studied in comparison with other populations (e.g., older adults). Within the studies focusing on PwMS, half that measure pace collected free-living data, while only one study explored gait variability in free-living conditions. No studies explore gait asymmetry or complexity in free-living conditions. Summary: Wearable technology has the ability to provide objective, comprehensive, and sensitive measures of gait in PwMS. Future research should investigate this technology’s ability to accurately assess free-living measures of gait quality, specifically gait asymmetry and complexity.",
keywords = "Community ambulation, Gait, Gait quality, Multiple sclerosis, Wearable technology",
author = "Frechette, {Mikaela L.} and Meyer, {Brett M.} and Tulipani, {Lindsey J.} and Gurchiek, {Reed D.} and McGinnis, {Ryan S.} and Sosnoff, {Jacob J}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11910-019-0997-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports",
issn = "1528-4042",
publisher = "Current Medicine Group",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Next Steps in Wearable Technology and Community Ambulation in Multiple Sclerosis

AU - Frechette, Mikaela L.

AU - Meyer, Brett M.

AU - Tulipani, Lindsey J.

AU - Gurchiek, Reed D.

AU - McGinnis, Ryan S.

AU - Sosnoff, Jacob J

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Purpose of Review: Walking impairments are highly prevalent in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and are associated with reduced quality of life. Walking is traditionally quantified with various measures, including patient self-reports, clinical rating scales, performance measures, and advanced lab-based movement analysis techniques. Yet, the majority of these measures do not fully characterize walking (i.e., gait quality) nor adequately reflect walking in the real world (i.e., community ambulation) and have limited timescale (only measure walking at a single point in time). We discuss the potential of wearable sensors to provide sensitive, objective, and easy-to-use assessment of community ambulation in PwMS. Recent Findings: Wearable technology has the ability to measure all aspects of gait in PwMS yet is under-studied in comparison with other populations (e.g., older adults). Within the studies focusing on PwMS, half that measure pace collected free-living data, while only one study explored gait variability in free-living conditions. No studies explore gait asymmetry or complexity in free-living conditions. Summary: Wearable technology has the ability to provide objective, comprehensive, and sensitive measures of gait in PwMS. Future research should investigate this technology’s ability to accurately assess free-living measures of gait quality, specifically gait asymmetry and complexity.

AB - Purpose of Review: Walking impairments are highly prevalent in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and are associated with reduced quality of life. Walking is traditionally quantified with various measures, including patient self-reports, clinical rating scales, performance measures, and advanced lab-based movement analysis techniques. Yet, the majority of these measures do not fully characterize walking (i.e., gait quality) nor adequately reflect walking in the real world (i.e., community ambulation) and have limited timescale (only measure walking at a single point in time). We discuss the potential of wearable sensors to provide sensitive, objective, and easy-to-use assessment of community ambulation in PwMS. Recent Findings: Wearable technology has the ability to measure all aspects of gait in PwMS yet is under-studied in comparison with other populations (e.g., older adults). Within the studies focusing on PwMS, half that measure pace collected free-living data, while only one study explored gait variability in free-living conditions. No studies explore gait asymmetry or complexity in free-living conditions. Summary: Wearable technology has the ability to provide objective, comprehensive, and sensitive measures of gait in PwMS. Future research should investigate this technology’s ability to accurately assess free-living measures of gait quality, specifically gait asymmetry and complexity.

KW - Community ambulation

KW - Gait

KW - Gait quality

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Wearable technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071749175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071749175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11910-019-0997-9

DO - 10.1007/s11910-019-0997-9

M3 - Review article

C2 - 31485896

AN - SCOPUS:85071749175

VL - 19

JO - Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

JF - Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

SN - 1528-4042

IS - 10

M1 - 80

ER -