New Spaces and Old Places: An Analysis of Writing Assessment Software

Colleen Vojak, Sonia Kline, Bill Cope, Sarah McCarthey, Mary Kalantzis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of emerging writing assessment technologies. Instead of providing a comprehensive review of each program, we take a deliberately selective approach using three key understandings about writing as a framework for analysis: writing is a socially situated activity; writing is functionally and formally diverse; and writing is a meaning-making activity that can be conveyed in multiple modalities. We conclude that the programs available today largely neglect the potential of emerging technologies to promote a broader vision of writing. Instead, they tend to align with the narrow view of writing dominant in a more recent era of testing and accountability, a view that is increasingly thrown into question. New technologies, we conclude, are for the most part being used to reinforce old practices. At a time when computer technology is increasingly looked to as a way to improve assessment, these findings have important implications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-111
Number of pages15
JournalComputers and Composition
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

technology assessment
software
Writing Assessment
Software
Testing
neglect
new technology
responsibility
Emerging Technologies
Meaning Making
Accountability
Neglect
Modality
Computer Technology
time

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Learner feedback
  • Pedagogy
  • Technology
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

New Spaces and Old Places : An Analysis of Writing Assessment Software. / Vojak, Colleen; Kline, Sonia; Cope, Bill; McCarthey, Sarah; Kalantzis, Mary.

In: Computers and Composition, Vol. 28, No. 2, 01.06.2011, p. 97-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a414421f69664d769e6a400ece8ea566,
title = "New Spaces and Old Places: An Analysis of Writing Assessment Software",
abstract = "This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of emerging writing assessment technologies. Instead of providing a comprehensive review of each program, we take a deliberately selective approach using three key understandings about writing as a framework for analysis: writing is a socially situated activity; writing is functionally and formally diverse; and writing is a meaning-making activity that can be conveyed in multiple modalities. We conclude that the programs available today largely neglect the potential of emerging technologies to promote a broader vision of writing. Instead, they tend to align with the narrow view of writing dominant in a more recent era of testing and accountability, a view that is increasingly thrown into question. New technologies, we conclude, are for the most part being used to reinforce old practices. At a time when computer technology is increasingly looked to as a way to improve assessment, these findings have important implications.",
keywords = "Assessment, Learner feedback, Pedagogy, Technology, Writing",
author = "Colleen Vojak and Sonia Kline and Bill Cope and Sarah McCarthey and Mary Kalantzis",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "97--111",
journal = "Computers and Composition",
issn = "8755-4615",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New Spaces and Old Places

T2 - An Analysis of Writing Assessment Software

AU - Vojak, Colleen

AU - Kline, Sonia

AU - Cope, Bill

AU - McCarthey, Sarah

AU - Kalantzis, Mary

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of emerging writing assessment technologies. Instead of providing a comprehensive review of each program, we take a deliberately selective approach using three key understandings about writing as a framework for analysis: writing is a socially situated activity; writing is functionally and formally diverse; and writing is a meaning-making activity that can be conveyed in multiple modalities. We conclude that the programs available today largely neglect the potential of emerging technologies to promote a broader vision of writing. Instead, they tend to align with the narrow view of writing dominant in a more recent era of testing and accountability, a view that is increasingly thrown into question. New technologies, we conclude, are for the most part being used to reinforce old practices. At a time when computer technology is increasingly looked to as a way to improve assessment, these findings have important implications.

AB - This article examines the strengths and weaknesses of emerging writing assessment technologies. Instead of providing a comprehensive review of each program, we take a deliberately selective approach using three key understandings about writing as a framework for analysis: writing is a socially situated activity; writing is functionally and formally diverse; and writing is a meaning-making activity that can be conveyed in multiple modalities. We conclude that the programs available today largely neglect the potential of emerging technologies to promote a broader vision of writing. Instead, they tend to align with the narrow view of writing dominant in a more recent era of testing and accountability, a view that is increasingly thrown into question. New technologies, we conclude, are for the most part being used to reinforce old practices. At a time when computer technology is increasingly looked to as a way to improve assessment, these findings have important implications.

KW - Assessment

KW - Learner feedback

KW - Pedagogy

KW - Technology

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958768385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958768385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79958768385

VL - 28

SP - 97

EP - 111

JO - Computers and Composition

JF - Computers and Composition

SN - 8755-4615

IS - 2

ER -