TY - JOUR
T1 - New constraints on Cenozoic subduction between India and Tibet
AU - Liu, Liang
AU - Liu, Lijun
AU - Morgan, Jason P.
AU - Xu, Yi Gang
AU - Chen, Ling
N1 - This project was supported by the Fundamental and Applied Fundamental Research Major Program of Guangdong Province (2019B030302013) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant no. 2022YFF0801002). L.-J.L. acknowledges the Geo Thrust fund at UIUC and the NSF (EAR1554554). J.P.M. acknowledges NSFC support from grants 42150710533 and 42074114. We thank An Yin, Qiang Wang, Hong-Yan Li, Bing Xia, Douwe van Hinsbergen, Petter DeCelles, Paul Kapp, Qiang Ma, Xiaolong Ma, Yuan-Yuan Hua, Xian-Hou Liu, Li Lü, Ming Zhu, and Yu-You Liu for constructive discussions on improving this work. L.L.‘s study was supported by the NSFC (Grants 42104105) and Tuguangchi Award for Excellent Young Scholar (TGC202101).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - The type of lithosphere subducted between India and Tibet since the Paleocene remains controversial; it has been suggested to be either entirely continental, oceanic, or a mixture of the two. As the subduction history of this lost lithosphere strongly shaped Tibetan intraplate tectonism, we attempt to further constrain its nature and density structure with numerical models that aim to reproduce the observed history of magmatism and crustal thickening in addition to present-day plateau properties between 83°E and 88°E. By matching time-evolving geological patterns, here we show that Tibetan tectonism away from the Himalayan syntaxis is consistent with the initial indentation of a craton-like terrane at 55 ± 5 Ma, followed by a buoyant tectonic plate with a thin crust, e.g., a broad continental margin (Himalandia). This new geodynamic scenario can explain the seemingly contradictory observations that had led to competing hypotheses like the subduction of Greater India versus largely oceanic subduction prior to Indian indentation.
AB - The type of lithosphere subducted between India and Tibet since the Paleocene remains controversial; it has been suggested to be either entirely continental, oceanic, or a mixture of the two. As the subduction history of this lost lithosphere strongly shaped Tibetan intraplate tectonism, we attempt to further constrain its nature and density structure with numerical models that aim to reproduce the observed history of magmatism and crustal thickening in addition to present-day plateau properties between 83°E and 88°E. By matching time-evolving geological patterns, here we show that Tibetan tectonism away from the Himalayan syntaxis is consistent with the initial indentation of a craton-like terrane at 55 ± 5 Ma, followed by a buoyant tectonic plate with a thin crust, e.g., a broad continental margin (Himalandia). This new geodynamic scenario can explain the seemingly contradictory observations that had led to competing hypotheses like the subduction of Greater India versus largely oceanic subduction prior to Indian indentation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85152022406
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85152022406#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-023-37615-5
DO - 10.1038/s41467-023-37615-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 37029113
AN - SCOPUS:85152022406
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 14
JO - Nature communications
JF - Nature communications
IS - 1
M1 - 1963
ER -