Never Cared to Say Goodbye: Presidential Legacies and Vice Presidential Campaigns

John M. Murphy, Mary E. Stuckey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Presidents are always concerned with their places in history and spend considerable time trying to influence historical judgments. One important locus for the exercise of such influence is the campaign of a potential successor. This article analyzes the ways in which presidents attempt to influence judgments of their legacies through the campaigns of their vice presidents. We focus on presidential discourse during the campaigns of 1960, 1968, 1988, and 2000. Each president used three primary rhetorical strategies in support of his vice president. These strategies formed a coherent narrative, a story that almost inevitably diminished the vice president and cut against the ostensible goal of the discourse: the elevation of the vice president to the presidency.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-66
JournalPresidential Studies Quarterly
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2002

Fingerprint

president
campaign
discourse
narrative
history
Discourse

Cite this

Never Cared to Say Goodbye : Presidential Legacies and Vice Presidential Campaigns. / Murphy, John M.; Stuckey, Mary E.

In: Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.03.2002, p. 46-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90c10de1afdf40cc8496da6e01c9fa84,
title = "Never Cared to Say Goodbye: Presidential Legacies and Vice Presidential Campaigns",
abstract = "Presidents are always concerned with their places in history and spend considerable time trying to influence historical judgments. One important locus for the exercise of such influence is the campaign of a potential successor. This article analyzes the ways in which presidents attempt to influence judgments of their legacies through the campaigns of their vice presidents. We focus on presidential discourse during the campaigns of 1960, 1968, 1988, and 2000. Each president used three primary rhetorical strategies in support of his vice president. These strategies formed a coherent narrative, a story that almost inevitably diminished the vice president and cut against the ostensible goal of the discourse: the elevation of the vice president to the presidency.",
author = "Murphy, {John M.} and Stuckey, {Mary E.}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/psq.2002.32.issue-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "46--66",
journal = "Presidential Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0360-4918",
publisher = "Center for the Study of the Presidency",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Never Cared to Say Goodbye

T2 - Presidential Legacies and Vice Presidential Campaigns

AU - Murphy, John M.

AU - Stuckey, Mary E.

PY - 2002/3/1

Y1 - 2002/3/1

N2 - Presidents are always concerned with their places in history and spend considerable time trying to influence historical judgments. One important locus for the exercise of such influence is the campaign of a potential successor. This article analyzes the ways in which presidents attempt to influence judgments of their legacies through the campaigns of their vice presidents. We focus on presidential discourse during the campaigns of 1960, 1968, 1988, and 2000. Each president used three primary rhetorical strategies in support of his vice president. These strategies formed a coherent narrative, a story that almost inevitably diminished the vice president and cut against the ostensible goal of the discourse: the elevation of the vice president to the presidency.

AB - Presidents are always concerned with their places in history and spend considerable time trying to influence historical judgments. One important locus for the exercise of such influence is the campaign of a potential successor. This article analyzes the ways in which presidents attempt to influence judgments of their legacies through the campaigns of their vice presidents. We focus on presidential discourse during the campaigns of 1960, 1968, 1988, and 2000. Each president used three primary rhetorical strategies in support of his vice president. These strategies formed a coherent narrative, a story that almost inevitably diminished the vice president and cut against the ostensible goal of the discourse: the elevation of the vice president to the presidency.

U2 - 10.1111/psq.2002.32.issue-1

DO - 10.1111/psq.2002.32.issue-1

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 46

EP - 66

JO - Presidential Studies Quarterly

JF - Presidential Studies Quarterly

SN - 0360-4918

IS - 1

ER -