Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds

Matthew I.M. Louder, Shelby Lawson, Kathleen S. Lynch, Christopher N. Balakrishnan, Mark Erno Hauber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Auditory communication in humans and other animals frequently takes place in noisy environments with many co-occurring signallers. Receivers are thus challenged to rapidly recognize salient auditory signals and filter out irrelevant sounds. Most bird species produce a variety of complex vocalizations that function to communicate with other members of their own species and behavioural evidence broadly supports preferences for conspecific over heterospecific sounds (auditory species recognition). However, it remains unclear whether such auditory signals are categorically recognized by the sensory and central nervous system. Here, we review 53 published studies that compare avian neural responses between conspecific versus heterospecific vocalizations. Irrespective of the techniques used to characterize neural activity, distinct nuclei of the auditory forebrain are consistently shown to be repeatedly conspecific selective across taxa, even in response to unfamiliar individuals with distinct acoustic properties. Yet, species-specific neural discrimination is not a stereotyped auditory response, but is modulated according to its salience depending, for example, on ontogenetic exposure to conspecific versus heterospecific stimuli. Neuromodulators, in particular norepinephrine, may mediate species recognition by regulating the accuracy of neuronal coding for salient conspecific stimuli. Our review lends strong support for neural structures that categorically recognize conspecific signals despite the highly variable physical properties of the stimulus. The available data are in support of a ‘perceptual filter’-based mechanism to determine the saliency of the signal, in that species identity and social experience combine to influence the neural processing of species-specific auditory stimuli. Finally, we present hypotheses and their testable predictions, to propose next steps in species-recognition research into the emerging model of the neural conceptual construct in avian auditory recognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1619-1635
Number of pages17
JournalBiological Reviews
Volume94
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

Birds
vocalization
Acoustic waves
acoustic properties
Acoustic properties
Social Identification
birds
Neurology
communication (human)
Prosencephalon
norepinephrine
neurotransmitters
Acoustics
central nervous system
Neurotransmitter Agents
physical properties
Norepinephrine
Animals
Central Nervous System
Physical properties

Keywords

  • auditory forebrain
  • imprinting
  • object recognition
  • ornithology
  • sexual selection
  • species recognition
  • vocal learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Louder, M. I. M., Lawson, S., Lynch, K. S., Balakrishnan, C. N., & Hauber, M. E. (2019). Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds. Biological Reviews, 94(5), 1619-1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12518

Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds. / Louder, Matthew I.M.; Lawson, Shelby; Lynch, Kathleen S.; Balakrishnan, Christopher N.; Hauber, Mark Erno.

In: Biological Reviews, Vol. 94, No. 5, 01.10.2019, p. 1619-1635.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Louder, MIM, Lawson, S, Lynch, KS, Balakrishnan, CN & Hauber, ME 2019, 'Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds', Biological Reviews, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1619-1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12518
Louder MIM, Lawson S, Lynch KS, Balakrishnan CN, Hauber ME. Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds. Biological Reviews. 2019 Oct 1;94(5):1619-1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12518
Louder, Matthew I.M. ; Lawson, Shelby ; Lynch, Kathleen S. ; Balakrishnan, Christopher N. ; Hauber, Mark Erno. / Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds. In: Biological Reviews. 2019 ; Vol. 94, No. 5. pp. 1619-1635.
@article{bd199f734a7e4658a6d1866634744771,
title = "Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds",
abstract = "Auditory communication in humans and other animals frequently takes place in noisy environments with many co-occurring signallers. Receivers are thus challenged to rapidly recognize salient auditory signals and filter out irrelevant sounds. Most bird species produce a variety of complex vocalizations that function to communicate with other members of their own species and behavioural evidence broadly supports preferences for conspecific over heterospecific sounds (auditory species recognition). However, it remains unclear whether such auditory signals are categorically recognized by the sensory and central nervous system. Here, we review 53 published studies that compare avian neural responses between conspecific versus heterospecific vocalizations. Irrespective of the techniques used to characterize neural activity, distinct nuclei of the auditory forebrain are consistently shown to be repeatedly conspecific selective across taxa, even in response to unfamiliar individuals with distinct acoustic properties. Yet, species-specific neural discrimination is not a stereotyped auditory response, but is modulated according to its salience depending, for example, on ontogenetic exposure to conspecific versus heterospecific stimuli. Neuromodulators, in particular norepinephrine, may mediate species recognition by regulating the accuracy of neuronal coding for salient conspecific stimuli. Our review lends strong support for neural structures that categorically recognize conspecific signals despite the highly variable physical properties of the stimulus. The available data are in support of a ‘perceptual filter’-based mechanism to determine the saliency of the signal, in that species identity and social experience combine to influence the neural processing of species-specific auditory stimuli. Finally, we present hypotheses and their testable predictions, to propose next steps in species-recognition research into the emerging model of the neural conceptual construct in avian auditory recognition.",
keywords = "auditory forebrain, imprinting, object recognition, ornithology, sexual selection, species recognition, vocal learning",
author = "Louder, {Matthew I.M.} and Shelby Lawson and Lynch, {Kathleen S.} and Balakrishnan, {Christopher N.} and Hauber, {Mark Erno}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/brv.12518",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "1619--1635",
journal = "Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society",
issn = "1464-7931",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural mechanisms of auditory species recognition in birds

AU - Louder, Matthew I.M.

AU - Lawson, Shelby

AU - Lynch, Kathleen S.

AU - Balakrishnan, Christopher N.

AU - Hauber, Mark Erno

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Auditory communication in humans and other animals frequently takes place in noisy environments with many co-occurring signallers. Receivers are thus challenged to rapidly recognize salient auditory signals and filter out irrelevant sounds. Most bird species produce a variety of complex vocalizations that function to communicate with other members of their own species and behavioural evidence broadly supports preferences for conspecific over heterospecific sounds (auditory species recognition). However, it remains unclear whether such auditory signals are categorically recognized by the sensory and central nervous system. Here, we review 53 published studies that compare avian neural responses between conspecific versus heterospecific vocalizations. Irrespective of the techniques used to characterize neural activity, distinct nuclei of the auditory forebrain are consistently shown to be repeatedly conspecific selective across taxa, even in response to unfamiliar individuals with distinct acoustic properties. Yet, species-specific neural discrimination is not a stereotyped auditory response, but is modulated according to its salience depending, for example, on ontogenetic exposure to conspecific versus heterospecific stimuli. Neuromodulators, in particular norepinephrine, may mediate species recognition by regulating the accuracy of neuronal coding for salient conspecific stimuli. Our review lends strong support for neural structures that categorically recognize conspecific signals despite the highly variable physical properties of the stimulus. The available data are in support of a ‘perceptual filter’-based mechanism to determine the saliency of the signal, in that species identity and social experience combine to influence the neural processing of species-specific auditory stimuli. Finally, we present hypotheses and their testable predictions, to propose next steps in species-recognition research into the emerging model of the neural conceptual construct in avian auditory recognition.

AB - Auditory communication in humans and other animals frequently takes place in noisy environments with many co-occurring signallers. Receivers are thus challenged to rapidly recognize salient auditory signals and filter out irrelevant sounds. Most bird species produce a variety of complex vocalizations that function to communicate with other members of their own species and behavioural evidence broadly supports preferences for conspecific over heterospecific sounds (auditory species recognition). However, it remains unclear whether such auditory signals are categorically recognized by the sensory and central nervous system. Here, we review 53 published studies that compare avian neural responses between conspecific versus heterospecific vocalizations. Irrespective of the techniques used to characterize neural activity, distinct nuclei of the auditory forebrain are consistently shown to be repeatedly conspecific selective across taxa, even in response to unfamiliar individuals with distinct acoustic properties. Yet, species-specific neural discrimination is not a stereotyped auditory response, but is modulated according to its salience depending, for example, on ontogenetic exposure to conspecific versus heterospecific stimuli. Neuromodulators, in particular norepinephrine, may mediate species recognition by regulating the accuracy of neuronal coding for salient conspecific stimuli. Our review lends strong support for neural structures that categorically recognize conspecific signals despite the highly variable physical properties of the stimulus. The available data are in support of a ‘perceptual filter’-based mechanism to determine the saliency of the signal, in that species identity and social experience combine to influence the neural processing of species-specific auditory stimuli. Finally, we present hypotheses and their testable predictions, to propose next steps in species-recognition research into the emerging model of the neural conceptual construct in avian auditory recognition.

KW - auditory forebrain

KW - imprinting

KW - object recognition

KW - ornithology

KW - sexual selection

KW - species recognition

KW - vocal learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065490054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065490054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/brv.12518

DO - 10.1111/brv.12518

M3 - Article

C2 - 31066222

AN - SCOPUS:85065490054

VL - 94

SP - 1619

EP - 1635

JO - Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

JF - Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

SN - 1464-7931

IS - 5

ER -