TY - JOUR
T1 - Network Neuroscience Theory of Human Intelligence
AU - Barbey, Aron K.
N1 - Funding Information:
The work was supported by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), via contract 2014-13121700004 to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (principal investigator: A.K.B.). The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the ODNI, IARPA, or the US Government. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright annotation thereon. The author is grateful for the helpful comments provided by Adam Hampshire and two anonymous reviewers.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - An enduring aim of research in the psychological and brain sciences is to understand the nature of individual differences in human intelligence, examining the stunning breadth and diversity of intellectual abilities and the remarkable neurobiological mechanisms from which they arise. This Opinion article surveys recent neuroscience evidence to elucidate how general intelligence, g, emerges from individual differences in the network architecture of the human brain. The reviewed findings motivate new insights about how network topology and dynamics account for individual differences in g, represented by the Network Neuroscience Theory. According to this framework, g emerges from the small-world topology of brain networks and the dynamic reorganization of its community structure in the service of system-wide flexibility and adaptation. Accumulating evidence from network neuroscience indicates that g depends on the dynamic reorganization of brain networks, modifying their topology and community structure in the service of system-wide flexibility and adaptation. Whereas crystallized intelligence engages easy-to-reach network states that access prior knowledge and experience, fluid intelligence recruits difficult-to-reach network states that support cognitive flexibility and adaptive problem-solving. The capacity to flexibly transition between networks states therefore provides the basis for g – enabling rapid information exchange across networks and capturing individual differences in information processing at a global level. This framework sets the stage for new approaches to understanding the neural foundations of g, examining individual differences in brain network topology and dynamics.
AB - An enduring aim of research in the psychological and brain sciences is to understand the nature of individual differences in human intelligence, examining the stunning breadth and diversity of intellectual abilities and the remarkable neurobiological mechanisms from which they arise. This Opinion article surveys recent neuroscience evidence to elucidate how general intelligence, g, emerges from individual differences in the network architecture of the human brain. The reviewed findings motivate new insights about how network topology and dynamics account for individual differences in g, represented by the Network Neuroscience Theory. According to this framework, g emerges from the small-world topology of brain networks and the dynamic reorganization of its community structure in the service of system-wide flexibility and adaptation. Accumulating evidence from network neuroscience indicates that g depends on the dynamic reorganization of brain networks, modifying their topology and community structure in the service of system-wide flexibility and adaptation. Whereas crystallized intelligence engages easy-to-reach network states that access prior knowledge and experience, fluid intelligence recruits difficult-to-reach network states that support cognitive flexibility and adaptive problem-solving. The capacity to flexibly transition between networks states therefore provides the basis for g – enabling rapid information exchange across networks and capturing individual differences in information processing at a global level. This framework sets the stage for new approaches to understanding the neural foundations of g, examining individual differences in brain network topology and dynamics.
KW - brain network dynamics
KW - crystallized intelligence
KW - fluid intelligence
KW - general intelligence
KW - intrinsic connectivity networks
KW - small-world network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034584135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034584135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 29167088
SN - 1364-6613
VL - 22
SP - 8
EP - 20
JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
IS - 1
ER -