Network architecture predisposes an enzyme to either pharmacologic or genetic targeting

Karin J. Jensen, Christian B. Moyer, Kevin A. Janes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Chemical inhibition and genetic knockdown of enzymes are not equivalent in cells, but network-level mechanisms that cause discrepancies between knockdown and inhibitor perturbations are not understood. Here we report that enzymes regulated by negative feedback are robust to knockdown but susceptible to inhibition. Using the Raf-MEK-ERK kinase cascade as a model system, we find that ERK activation is resistant to genetic knockdown of MEK but susceptible to a comparable degree of chemical MEK inhibition. We demonstrate that negative feedback from ERK to Raf causes this knockdown-versus-inhibitor discrepancy in vivo. Exhaustive mathematical modeling of three-tiered enzyme cascades suggests that this result is general: negative autoregulation or feedback favors inhibitor potency, whereas positive autoregulation or feedback favors knockdown potency. Our findings provide a rationale for selecting pharmacologic versus genetic perturbations in vivo and point out the dangers of using knockdown approaches in search of drug targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-121
Number of pages10
JournalCell Systems
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 24 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Network architecture predisposes an enzyme to either pharmacologic or genetic targeting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this