TY - JOUR
T1 - Nest defence as shareable paternal care in red-winged blackbirds
AU - Weatherhead, Patrick J.
N1 - Funding Information:
I am grateful to Drew Hoysak, Kit Muma and Kevin Dufour for assisting with data collection, Drew Hoysak for helping with data analysis and Bob Montgomerie for commenting on the manuscript. Financial support was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
PY - 1990/6
Y1 - 1990/6
N2 - One of the costs to female birds of mating polygynously is having to share the parental care provided by their mate. Nest defence, however, is one form of paternal care that females mated to the same male should be able to share. In this study there was no difference in the defence of primary and secondary nests by male red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Nests that were provisioned by males were not defended more aggressively than nests that were not provisioned. Nests that were successful had been defended more aggressively by males than those that failed, indicating that male nest defence is valuable to females. These results suggest that male nest defence is entirely shareable, in contrast to a recent study that showed males preferentially defended nests of primary females (Knight & Temple, Condor, 1988, 90, 193-200). Although the study design used here more realistically reflects natural nest defence (males had to defend one nest at a time rather than having to choose which of two nests to defend), it does not explain why males preferentially defended certain nests when forced to make a choice but not when defending nests one at a time.
AB - One of the costs to female birds of mating polygynously is having to share the parental care provided by their mate. Nest defence, however, is one form of paternal care that females mated to the same male should be able to share. In this study there was no difference in the defence of primary and secondary nests by male red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Nests that were provisioned by males were not defended more aggressively than nests that were not provisioned. Nests that were successful had been defended more aggressively by males than those that failed, indicating that male nest defence is valuable to females. These results suggest that male nest defence is entirely shareable, in contrast to a recent study that showed males preferentially defended nests of primary females (Knight & Temple, Condor, 1988, 90, 193-200). Although the study design used here more realistically reflects natural nest defence (males had to defend one nest at a time rather than having to choose which of two nests to defend), it does not explain why males preferentially defended certain nests when forced to make a choice but not when defending nests one at a time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025244033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025244033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80789-4
DO - 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80789-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0025244033
SN - 0003-3472
VL - 39
SP - 1173
EP - 1178
JO - Animal Behaviour
JF - Animal Behaviour
IS - 6
ER -