Abstract
Since the publication of A Nation at Risk, some scholars have argued that a national curriculum and national testing are necessary to hold school personnel accountable for student achievement and, ultimately, to raise educational standards. The idea of developing a nationwide curriculum has been widely debated in the United States, where the traditions of local control and state responsibility are dominant. Thus, this article examines the relevance and feasibility of a uniform curriculum in physical education. A core curriculum for physical education has the potential to provide clear goals, coherent instructional guidelines, and relevant assessments aligned with designated program outcomes. A more advanced curricula framework with clear guidance for P-12 curricula and pedagogical practices could promote system-wide changes in school-based physical education. In contrast, the adoption of an overly rigid national curriculum would create a stifling educational context where cultural differences and local flexibility are not allowed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 220-235 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Quest |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 3 2017 |
Keywords
- Curriculum reform
- national curriculum
- national standards
- physical education
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education