Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships

Emily Grijalva, Peter D. Harms, Daniel A. Newman, Blaine H. Gaddis, R. Chris Fraley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Past empirical studies relating narcissism to leadership have offered mixed results. This study integrates prior research findings via meta-analysis to make 4 contributions to theory on narcissism and leadership, by (a) distinguishing between leadership emergence and leadership effectiveness, to reveal that narcissism displays a positive relationship with leadership emergence, but no relationship with leadership effectiveness; (b) showing narcissism's positive effect on leadership emergence can be explained by leader extraversion; (c) demonstrating that whereas observer-reported leadership effectiveness ratings (e.g., supervisor-report, subordinate-report, and peer-report) are not related to narcissism, self-reported leadership effectiveness ratings are positively related to narcissism; and (d) illustrating that the nil linear relationship between narcissism and leadership effectiveness masks an underlying curvilinear trend, advancing the idea that there exists an optimal, midrange level of leader narcissism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-47
Number of pages47
JournalPersonnel Psychology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management


Dive into the research topics of 'Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this