Abstract
Media reports of the health hazards posed by nano-sized particles (NSPs) have turned a white hot spotlight on the risks of nanotechnology. Worried about the risks posed to workers producing nano-materials, the Washington Post has labeled nanotechnology a "seat-of-the-pants occupational health experiment." This article examines our emerging knowledge base about the hazards of two types of exposure: inhalation of NSPs and topical application of products containing NSPs. It argues that a clear-eyed evaluation of the benefits and risks of nanotechnology is made extremely difficult by the marriage of a complex science with a venture capitalist-like hype. It then suggests that, absent additional statutory authority, governmental regulators cannot readily address the risks posed by these products. This regulatory inaction leaves a significant role for the private insurance market, a role that regulators should support in tangible ways outlined in the article.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 704-713 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health Policy