Abstract

Nanomaterials acquire a biomolecular corona upon introduction to biological media, leading to biological transformations such as changes in protein function, unmasking of epitopes, and protein fibrilization. Ex vivo studies to investigate the effect of nanoparticles on protein–protein interactions are typically performed in buffer and are rarely measured quantitatively in live cells. Here, we measure the differential effect of silica nanoparticles on protein association in vitro vs. in mammalian cells. BtubA and BtubB are a pair of bacterial tubulin proteins identified in Prosthecobacter strains that self-assemble like eukaryotic tubulin, first into dimers and then into microtubules in vitro or in vivo. Förster resonance energy transfer labeling of each of the Btub monomers with a donor (mEGFP) and acceptor (mRuby3) fluorescent protein provides a quantitative tool to measure their binding interactions in the presence of unfunctionalized silica nanoparticles in buffer and in cells using fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy. We show that silica nanoparticles enhance BtubAB dimerization in buffer due to protein corona formation. However, these nanoparticles have little effect on bacterial tubulin self-assembly in the complex mammalian cellular environment. Thus, the effect of nanomaterials on protein–protein interactions may not be readily translated from the test tube to the cell in the absence of particle surface functionalization that can enable targeted protein–nanoparticle interactions to withstand competitive binding in the nanoparticle corona from other biomolecules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2403034121
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume121
Issue number28
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 9 2024

Keywords

  • FRET
  • bacterial tubulin
  • nanoparticle–protein corona
  • protein assembly

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nanoparticle-assisted tubulin assembly is environment dependent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this