NanoEHS - Defining fundamental science needs: No easy feat when the simple itself is complex

Vicki H. Grassian, Amanda J. Haes, Imali A. Mudunkotuwa, Philip Demokritou, Agnes B. Kane, Catherine J. Murphy, James E. Hutchison, Jacqueline A. Isaacs, Young Shin Jun, Barbara Karn, Saiful I. Khondaker, Sarah C. Larsen, Boris L.T. Lau, John M. Pettibone, Omowunmi A. Sadik, Navid B. Saleh, Clayton Teague

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Nanotechnology is no longer in its infancy and has made significant advances since the implementation of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in 2000. Incorporation of nanotechnology in many fields including information technology, medicine, materials, energy, catalysis and cosmetics has led to an increase in engineered nanomaterial (ENM) production, and consequently, increased nanomaterial use. In comparison, the generation of concrete and consistent evidence related to the environmental health and safety of nanomaterials (NanoEHS) is lacking. The main factors contributing to the slower progress in NanoEHS versus conventional EHS are related to the complexity, property transformations, life cycles and behavior of nanomaterials even in carefully controlled environments. Therefore, new systematic, integrated research approaches in NanoEHS are needed for overcoming this complexity and bridging current knowledge gaps. A workshop on "NanoEHS: Fundamental Science Needs" brought together scientists and engineers to identify current fundamental science challenges and opportunities within NanoEHS. Detailed discussions were conducted on identifying the fundamental properties that are critical in NanoEHS, differentiating between conventional and NanoEHS studies as well as understanding, the effect of dynamic transformations on nanometrology, role of dosimetry and mechanistic data gaps in nanotoxicology. An important realization that even simple nanoscale materials can be complex when considering NanoEHS implications was noted several times during the workshop. Despite this fact, a number of fundamental research areas to further the scientific foundation to address NanoEHS needs are suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-27
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Science: Nano
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
Nanostructured materials
Nanotechnology
catalysis
information technology
health and safety
medicine
Cosmetics
life cycle
Catalysis
Dosimetry
Medicine
Information technology
Life cycle
Health
Concretes
Engineers
energy
science
need

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science (miscellaneous)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Grassian, V. H., Haes, A. J., Mudunkotuwa, I. A., Demokritou, P., Kane, A. B., Murphy, C. J., ... Teague, C. (2016). NanoEHS - Defining fundamental science needs: No easy feat when the simple itself is complex. Environmental Science: Nano, 3(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5en00112a

NanoEHS - Defining fundamental science needs : No easy feat when the simple itself is complex. / Grassian, Vicki H.; Haes, Amanda J.; Mudunkotuwa, Imali A.; Demokritou, Philip; Kane, Agnes B.; Murphy, Catherine J.; Hutchison, James E.; Isaacs, Jacqueline A.; Jun, Young Shin; Karn, Barbara; Khondaker, Saiful I.; Larsen, Sarah C.; Lau, Boris L.T.; Pettibone, John M.; Sadik, Omowunmi A.; Saleh, Navid B.; Teague, Clayton.

In: Environmental Science: Nano, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 15-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Grassian, VH, Haes, AJ, Mudunkotuwa, IA, Demokritou, P, Kane, AB, Murphy, CJ, Hutchison, JE, Isaacs, JA, Jun, YS, Karn, B, Khondaker, SI, Larsen, SC, Lau, BLT, Pettibone, JM, Sadik, OA, Saleh, NB & Teague, C 2016, 'NanoEHS - Defining fundamental science needs: No easy feat when the simple itself is complex', Environmental Science: Nano, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5en00112a
Grassian, Vicki H. ; Haes, Amanda J. ; Mudunkotuwa, Imali A. ; Demokritou, Philip ; Kane, Agnes B. ; Murphy, Catherine J. ; Hutchison, James E. ; Isaacs, Jacqueline A. ; Jun, Young Shin ; Karn, Barbara ; Khondaker, Saiful I. ; Larsen, Sarah C. ; Lau, Boris L.T. ; Pettibone, John M. ; Sadik, Omowunmi A. ; Saleh, Navid B. ; Teague, Clayton. / NanoEHS - Defining fundamental science needs : No easy feat when the simple itself is complex. In: Environmental Science: Nano. 2016 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 15-27.
@article{56d54a6a51854263b9f63f9cb6c3acab,
title = "NanoEHS - Defining fundamental science needs: No easy feat when the simple itself is complex",
abstract = "Nanotechnology is no longer in its infancy and has made significant advances since the implementation of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in 2000. Incorporation of nanotechnology in many fields including information technology, medicine, materials, energy, catalysis and cosmetics has led to an increase in engineered nanomaterial (ENM) production, and consequently, increased nanomaterial use. In comparison, the generation of concrete and consistent evidence related to the environmental health and safety of nanomaterials (NanoEHS) is lacking. The main factors contributing to the slower progress in NanoEHS versus conventional EHS are related to the complexity, property transformations, life cycles and behavior of nanomaterials even in carefully controlled environments. Therefore, new systematic, integrated research approaches in NanoEHS are needed for overcoming this complexity and bridging current knowledge gaps. A workshop on {"}NanoEHS: Fundamental Science Needs{"} brought together scientists and engineers to identify current fundamental science challenges and opportunities within NanoEHS. Detailed discussions were conducted on identifying the fundamental properties that are critical in NanoEHS, differentiating between conventional and NanoEHS studies as well as understanding, the effect of dynamic transformations on nanometrology, role of dosimetry and mechanistic data gaps in nanotoxicology. An important realization that even simple nanoscale materials can be complex when considering NanoEHS implications was noted several times during the workshop. Despite this fact, a number of fundamental research areas to further the scientific foundation to address NanoEHS needs are suggested.",
author = "Grassian, {Vicki H.} and Haes, {Amanda J.} and Mudunkotuwa, {Imali A.} and Philip Demokritou and Kane, {Agnes B.} and Murphy, {Catherine J.} and Hutchison, {James E.} and Isaacs, {Jacqueline A.} and Jun, {Young Shin} and Barbara Karn and Khondaker, {Saiful I.} and Larsen, {Sarah C.} and Lau, {Boris L.T.} and Pettibone, {John M.} and Sadik, {Omowunmi A.} and Saleh, {Navid B.} and Clayton Teague",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1039/c5en00112a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "15--27",
journal = "Environmental Science: Nano",
issn = "2051-8153",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - NanoEHS - Defining fundamental science needs

T2 - No easy feat when the simple itself is complex

AU - Grassian, Vicki H.

AU - Haes, Amanda J.

AU - Mudunkotuwa, Imali A.

AU - Demokritou, Philip

AU - Kane, Agnes B.

AU - Murphy, Catherine J.

AU - Hutchison, James E.

AU - Isaacs, Jacqueline A.

AU - Jun, Young Shin

AU - Karn, Barbara

AU - Khondaker, Saiful I.

AU - Larsen, Sarah C.

AU - Lau, Boris L.T.

AU - Pettibone, John M.

AU - Sadik, Omowunmi A.

AU - Saleh, Navid B.

AU - Teague, Clayton

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Nanotechnology is no longer in its infancy and has made significant advances since the implementation of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in 2000. Incorporation of nanotechnology in many fields including information technology, medicine, materials, energy, catalysis and cosmetics has led to an increase in engineered nanomaterial (ENM) production, and consequently, increased nanomaterial use. In comparison, the generation of concrete and consistent evidence related to the environmental health and safety of nanomaterials (NanoEHS) is lacking. The main factors contributing to the slower progress in NanoEHS versus conventional EHS are related to the complexity, property transformations, life cycles and behavior of nanomaterials even in carefully controlled environments. Therefore, new systematic, integrated research approaches in NanoEHS are needed for overcoming this complexity and bridging current knowledge gaps. A workshop on "NanoEHS: Fundamental Science Needs" brought together scientists and engineers to identify current fundamental science challenges and opportunities within NanoEHS. Detailed discussions were conducted on identifying the fundamental properties that are critical in NanoEHS, differentiating between conventional and NanoEHS studies as well as understanding, the effect of dynamic transformations on nanometrology, role of dosimetry and mechanistic data gaps in nanotoxicology. An important realization that even simple nanoscale materials can be complex when considering NanoEHS implications was noted several times during the workshop. Despite this fact, a number of fundamental research areas to further the scientific foundation to address NanoEHS needs are suggested.

AB - Nanotechnology is no longer in its infancy and has made significant advances since the implementation of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in 2000. Incorporation of nanotechnology in many fields including information technology, medicine, materials, energy, catalysis and cosmetics has led to an increase in engineered nanomaterial (ENM) production, and consequently, increased nanomaterial use. In comparison, the generation of concrete and consistent evidence related to the environmental health and safety of nanomaterials (NanoEHS) is lacking. The main factors contributing to the slower progress in NanoEHS versus conventional EHS are related to the complexity, property transformations, life cycles and behavior of nanomaterials even in carefully controlled environments. Therefore, new systematic, integrated research approaches in NanoEHS are needed for overcoming this complexity and bridging current knowledge gaps. A workshop on "NanoEHS: Fundamental Science Needs" brought together scientists and engineers to identify current fundamental science challenges and opportunities within NanoEHS. Detailed discussions were conducted on identifying the fundamental properties that are critical in NanoEHS, differentiating between conventional and NanoEHS studies as well as understanding, the effect of dynamic transformations on nanometrology, role of dosimetry and mechanistic data gaps in nanotoxicology. An important realization that even simple nanoscale materials can be complex when considering NanoEHS implications was noted several times during the workshop. Despite this fact, a number of fundamental research areas to further the scientific foundation to address NanoEHS needs are suggested.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958256762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958256762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c5en00112a

DO - 10.1039/c5en00112a

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84958256762

VL - 3

SP - 15

EP - 27

JO - Environmental Science: Nano

JF - Environmental Science: Nano

SN - 2051-8153

IS - 1

ER -