Nam Lot (MIS 5) and Duoi U'Oi (MIS 4) Southeast Asian sites revisited: Zooarchaeological and isotopic evidences

Anne Marie Bacon, Nicolas Bourgon, Elise Dufour, Clément Zanolli, Philippe Duringer, Jean Luc Ponche, Pierre Olivier Antoine, Laura Shackelford, Nguyen Thi Mai Huong, Thongsa Sayavonkhamdy, Elise Patole-Edoumba, Fabrice Demeter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The Nam Lot site in Laos and the hominin-bearing Duoi U'Oi site in Vietnam are dated to MIS 5 (86–72 ka) and MIS 4 (70–60 ka), respectively. Located in the same latitudinal belt ~20°N in the north of the Indochinese area, the faunal assemblages recovered from breccia deposits in a karstic context have the potential to provide information on the palaeoenvironmental conditions faced by earliest modern humans when they entered the Southeast Asian mainland. Here, zooarchaeological evidence of faunas are reviewed combined with a new stable isotope analysis (δ13C and δ18O) of tooth enamel of mammals from Nam Lot (86–72 ka), to explore environmental conditions during MIS 5–4 periods. In both sites, large predators (hyena, tiger, leopard, and dhole) had access to a great diversity of prey among mammals. The Nam Lot isotopic results indicate during MIS 5 a complexity in the forest habitats with closed low-light tropical rainforest, “intermediate” rainforest, and C3–C4 open woodland/‘savanna’. This woodland ecosystem – notably the “intermediate” rainforest – carried most of the ungulate biomass, with a variety of small to large-bodied ground-dwelling animals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-144
Number of pages13
JournalPalaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
StatePublished - Dec 26 2018


  • Hominins
  • Laos
  • MIS 5–4
  • Mammalian faunas
  • Palaeoenvironment
  • Vietnam

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Palaeontology


Dive into the research topics of 'Nam Lot (MIS 5) and Duoi U'Oi (MIS 4) Southeast Asian sites revisited: Zooarchaeological and isotopic evidences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this