Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction

The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors

Kathleen C. Mcculloch, Hong Li, Sungjin Hong, Dolores Albarracin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action-inaction ratings of behaviors and states showed more social agreement at the ends of the inaction-action continuum than at the middle, suggesting a socially shared construal of this definition. Action-inaction ratings were also shown to correlate with the valence of the rated behaviors, such that the more active the behavior, the more positive its valence. Lastly, individual differences in locomotion, need for closure, and Christian religious beliefs correlated positively with a preference for action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-234
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Individuality
Religion
Locomotion
Research

Keywords

  • Action control
  • Agency
  • Inaction
  • Self-regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction : The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors. / Mcculloch, Kathleen C.; Li, Hong; Hong, Sungjin; Albarracin, Dolores.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 227-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17148bf3ab634986a946807a67320305,
title = "Na{\"i}ve Definitions of Action and Inaction: The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors",
abstract = "The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action-inaction ratings of behaviors and states showed more social agreement at the ends of the inaction-action continuum than at the middle, suggesting a socially shared construal of this definition. Action-inaction ratings were also shown to correlate with the valence of the rated behaviors, such that the more active the behavior, the more positive its valence. Lastly, individual differences in locomotion, need for closure, and Christian religious beliefs correlated positively with a preference for action.",
keywords = "Action control, Agency, Inaction, Self-regulation",
author = "Mcculloch, {Kathleen C.} and Hong Li and Sungjin Hong and Dolores Albarracin",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.860",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "227--234",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction

T2 - The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors

AU - Mcculloch, Kathleen C.

AU - Li, Hong

AU - Hong, Sungjin

AU - Albarracin, Dolores

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action-inaction ratings of behaviors and states showed more social agreement at the ends of the inaction-action continuum than at the middle, suggesting a socially shared construal of this definition. Action-inaction ratings were also shown to correlate with the valence of the rated behaviors, such that the more active the behavior, the more positive its valence. Lastly, individual differences in locomotion, need for closure, and Christian religious beliefs correlated positively with a preference for action.

AB - The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action-inaction ratings of behaviors and states showed more social agreement at the ends of the inaction-action continuum than at the middle, suggesting a socially shared construal of this definition. Action-inaction ratings were also shown to correlate with the valence of the rated behaviors, such that the more active the behavior, the more positive its valence. Lastly, individual differences in locomotion, need for closure, and Christian religious beliefs correlated positively with a preference for action.

KW - Action control

KW - Agency

KW - Inaction

KW - Self-regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857238794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857238794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.860

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.860

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 227

EP - 234

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 2

ER -