Mutuality, responsibility, and reciprocity in situations of marked inequality: Dilemmas of, and concerning, US anthropology in the world

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Paradoxes shape the relationship of the US anthropological community to its counterparts elsewhere and require new thinking about leadership that focuses on mutuality, responsibility, reciprocity, and pragmatism. Explored here are some key contradictions I see in ways of looking at the current, past, or plausible role of the US anthropological community and, in particular, the American Anthropological Association and its nearly forty Sections. Marked inequality exists among national and international anthropological organizations in size, finances, journal production, and conference attendance and often in perceived degree of importance, control, vibrancy, or agenda-setting. Yet this intervention argues for ways to mitigate that marked inequality, nonetheless, by refusing a binary us-them conceptualization and emphasizing creative pragmatism, mutuality, and responsibility. Unconventionally it even asks whether US anthropology should lead more in the world of anthropology than it currently does or lead less, and why both are worth exploring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-61
Number of pages11
JournalFocaal
Issue number63
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Contradictions
  • Leadership alternatives
  • Professional associations
  • Responsibility
  • US anthropology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mutuality, responsibility, and reciprocity in situations of marked inequality: Dilemmas of, and concerning, US anthropology in the world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this