TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutuality, responsibility, and reciprocity in situations of marked inequality
T2 - Dilemmas of, and concerning, US anthropology in the world
AU - Dominguez, Virginia R.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Paradoxes shape the relationship of the US anthropological community to its counterparts elsewhere and require new thinking about leadership that focuses on mutuality, responsibility, reciprocity, and pragmatism. Explored here are some key contradictions I see in ways of looking at the current, past, or plausible role of the US anthropological community and, in particular, the American Anthropological Association and its nearly forty Sections. Marked inequality exists among national and international anthropological organizations in size, finances, journal production, and conference attendance and often in perceived degree of importance, control, vibrancy, or agenda-setting. Yet this intervention argues for ways to mitigate that marked inequality, nonetheless, by refusing a binary us-them conceptualization and emphasizing creative pragmatism, mutuality, and responsibility. Unconventionally it even asks whether US anthropology should lead more in the world of anthropology than it currently does or lead less, and why both are worth exploring.
AB - Paradoxes shape the relationship of the US anthropological community to its counterparts elsewhere and require new thinking about leadership that focuses on mutuality, responsibility, reciprocity, and pragmatism. Explored here are some key contradictions I see in ways of looking at the current, past, or plausible role of the US anthropological community and, in particular, the American Anthropological Association and its nearly forty Sections. Marked inequality exists among national and international anthropological organizations in size, finances, journal production, and conference attendance and often in perceived degree of importance, control, vibrancy, or agenda-setting. Yet this intervention argues for ways to mitigate that marked inequality, nonetheless, by refusing a binary us-them conceptualization and emphasizing creative pragmatism, mutuality, and responsibility. Unconventionally it even asks whether US anthropology should lead more in the world of anthropology than it currently does or lead less, and why both are worth exploring.
KW - Contradictions
KW - Leadership alternatives
KW - Professional associations
KW - Responsibility
KW - US anthropology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866114221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866114221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3167/fcl.2012.630105
DO - 10.3167/fcl.2012.630105
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84866114221
SN - 0920-1297
SP - 51
EP - 61
JO - Focaal
JF - Focaal
IS - 63
ER -