TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutual Adjustments between Process and Form in a Desert Mountain Fluvial System
AU - Rhoads, Bruce L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Numerous persons deserve recognition for the time and effort they contributed to this study. William L. Craf provided insightful comments and criticisms throughout all phases of the research. Jeffrey Lee, Herb Verville, and Michael Lacey assisted in the collection of the field data. Leonard Lane, Hydrologist, Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, AZ kindly supplied me with a computer program of his distributed runoff model. Charles Rader and James Bier provided cartographic assistance. My thanks also to two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the final manuscript. The project was funded in part by the Arizona State University Graduate College Grant-in-Aid Program.
PY - 1988/6
Y1 - 1988/6
N2 - The analysis of earth surface systems is complicated by mutual adjustments among geomorphic variables. Most statistical models used by geomorphologists implicitly assume unidirectional causation. Simultaneousequation models represent an alternative statistical approach by which mutual adjustment mechanisms can be analyzed explicitly. This technique is used to develop a process-response model of a small desert mountain fluvial system in order to examine the system's internal structure and dynamics. In general, results confirm the expected interactions among variables in the model. Discharge, size of bed material, and the type of bank material are the dominant factors directly influencing channel width, suggesting that channel form reflects an interaction among hydrologie conditions, the caliber of the sediment load, and the resistance imposed by the channel perimeter. Results also indicate that local and upstream energy conditions strongly influence the mean grain size and sorting of the streambed materials at a particular location in the drainage network, but that bed material caliber has a relatively weak effect on channel gradient. Although the model contains a self-regulatory feedback loop, the dynamics of this fluvial system appear to differ from the concept of steady-state equilibrium. When displaced from stability by an exogenous disturbance, the variable states do not return to or fluctuate around their initial values. Rather, they converge on new limits that are different from their previous stable values. This type of response suggests that the system is metasta-ble. The process-response model provides a comparative framework for future investigations of desert mountain fluvial systems.
AB - The analysis of earth surface systems is complicated by mutual adjustments among geomorphic variables. Most statistical models used by geomorphologists implicitly assume unidirectional causation. Simultaneousequation models represent an alternative statistical approach by which mutual adjustment mechanisms can be analyzed explicitly. This technique is used to develop a process-response model of a small desert mountain fluvial system in order to examine the system's internal structure and dynamics. In general, results confirm the expected interactions among variables in the model. Discharge, size of bed material, and the type of bank material are the dominant factors directly influencing channel width, suggesting that channel form reflects an interaction among hydrologie conditions, the caliber of the sediment load, and the resistance imposed by the channel perimeter. Results also indicate that local and upstream energy conditions strongly influence the mean grain size and sorting of the streambed materials at a particular location in the drainage network, but that bed material caliber has a relatively weak effect on channel gradient. Although the model contains a self-regulatory feedback loop, the dynamics of this fluvial system appear to differ from the concept of steady-state equilibrium. When displaced from stability by an exogenous disturbance, the variable states do not return to or fluctuate around their initial values. Rather, they converge on new limits that are different from their previous stable values. This type of response suggests that the system is metasta-ble. The process-response model provides a comparative framework for future investigations of desert mountain fluvial systems.
KW - equilibrium
KW - fluvial geomorphology
KW - simultaneousequation models
KW - systems analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024248975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024248975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00207.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00207.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0024248975
SN - 0004-5608
VL - 78
SP - 271
EP - 287
JO - Annals of the Association of American Geographers
JF - Annals of the Association of American Geographers
IS - 2
ER -