TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutational analysis of molecular requirements for the actions of general anaesthetics at the γ-aminobutyric acidA receptor subtype, α1β2γ2
AU - Siegwart, Robert
AU - Krähenbühl, Karin
AU - Lambert, Sachar
AU - Rudolph, Uwe
PY - 2003/11/12
Y1 - 2003/11/12
N2 - Background: Amino acids in the β subunit contribute to the action of general anaesthetics on GABAA receptors. We have now characterized the phenotypic effect of two β subunit mutations in the most abundant GABAA receptor subtype, α1β 2γ2. Results: The β2(N265M) mutation in M2 decreased the modulatory actions of propofol, etomidate and enflurane, but not of alphaxalone, while the direct actions of propofol, etomidate and alphaxalone were impaired. The β2(M286W) mutation in M3 decreased the modulatory actions of propofol, etomidate and enflurane, but not of alphaxalone, whereas the direct action of propofol and etomidate, but not of alphaxalone, was impaired. Conclusions: We found that the actions of general anaesthetics at α1β2(N265M)γ2 and α1β2(M286W)γ2 GABAA receptors are similar to those previously observed at α2β3(N265M)γ2 and α2β3(M286W)γ2 GABAA receptors, respectively, with the notable exceptions that the direct action of propofol was decreased in α1β 2(M286W)γ2 receptors but indistinguishable form wild type in α 2β3(M286W)γ2 receptors and that the direct action of alphaxalone was decreased in α1β2(N265M)γ2 but not α2β3(N265M)γ2 receptors and indistinguishable form wild type in α1β2(M286W)γ2 receptors but increased in α2β3(M286W)γ2 receptors. Thus, selected phenotypic consequences of these two mutations are GABAA receptor subtype-specific.
AB - Background: Amino acids in the β subunit contribute to the action of general anaesthetics on GABAA receptors. We have now characterized the phenotypic effect of two β subunit mutations in the most abundant GABAA receptor subtype, α1β 2γ2. Results: The β2(N265M) mutation in M2 decreased the modulatory actions of propofol, etomidate and enflurane, but not of alphaxalone, while the direct actions of propofol, etomidate and alphaxalone were impaired. The β2(M286W) mutation in M3 decreased the modulatory actions of propofol, etomidate and enflurane, but not of alphaxalone, whereas the direct action of propofol and etomidate, but not of alphaxalone, was impaired. Conclusions: We found that the actions of general anaesthetics at α1β2(N265M)γ2 and α1β2(M286W)γ2 GABAA receptors are similar to those previously observed at α2β3(N265M)γ2 and α2β3(M286W)γ2 GABAA receptors, respectively, with the notable exceptions that the direct action of propofol was decreased in α1β 2(M286W)γ2 receptors but indistinguishable form wild type in α 2β3(M286W)γ2 receptors and that the direct action of alphaxalone was decreased in α1β2(N265M)γ2 but not α2β3(N265M)γ2 receptors and indistinguishable form wild type in α1β2(M286W)γ2 receptors but increased in α2β3(M286W)γ2 receptors. Thus, selected phenotypic consequences of these two mutations are GABAA receptor subtype-specific.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642533707&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642533707&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2210-3-13
DO - 10.1186/1471-2210-3-13
M3 - Article
C2 - 14613517
AN - SCOPUS:2642533707
VL - 3
JO - BMC Pharmacology
JF - BMC Pharmacology
SN - 1471-2210
M1 - 13
ER -