Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres: The coarse coding hypothesis revisited

Padmapriya Kandhadai, Kara D Federmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The coarse coding hypothesis postulates that the cerebral hemispheres differ in their breadth of semantic activation, with the left hemisphere activating a narrow, focused semantic field and the right weakly activating a broader semantic field. In support of coarse coding, studies investigating priming for multiple senses of a lexically ambiguous word have reported a right hemisphere benefit. However, studies of mediated priming have failed to find a right hemisphere advantage for processing distantly linked, unambiguous words. To address this debate, the present study made use of a multiple priming paradigm in which two primes either converged onto the single meaning of an unambiguous, lexically associated target (LION-STRIPES-TIGER) or diverged onto different meanings of an ambiguous target (KIDNEY-PIANO-ORGAN). In two experiments, participants either made lexical decisions to lateralized targets (Experiment 1) or made a semantic relatedness judgment between primes and targets (Experiment 2). In both tasks, for both ambiguous and unambiguous triplets we found equivalent priming strengths and patterns across the two visual fields, counter to the predictions of the coarse coding hypothesis. Priming patterns further suggested that both hemispheres made use of lexical level representations in the lexical decision task and semantic representations in the semantic judgment task.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-157
Number of pages14
JournalBrain Research
Volume1153
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 11 2007

Fingerprint

Cerebrum
Semantics
Visual Fields

Keywords

  • Cerebral hemispheres
  • Coarse coding hypothesis
  • Lexical ambiguity
  • Semantic priming
  • Summation priming
  • Word processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Molecular Biology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres : The coarse coding hypothesis revisited. / Kandhadai, Padmapriya; Federmeier, Kara D.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 1153, No. 1, 11.06.2007, p. 144-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2929439803df44c9b083e5861c58a757,
title = "Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres: The coarse coding hypothesis revisited",
abstract = "The coarse coding hypothesis postulates that the cerebral hemispheres differ in their breadth of semantic activation, with the left hemisphere activating a narrow, focused semantic field and the right weakly activating a broader semantic field. In support of coarse coding, studies investigating priming for multiple senses of a lexically ambiguous word have reported a right hemisphere benefit. However, studies of mediated priming have failed to find a right hemisphere advantage for processing distantly linked, unambiguous words. To address this debate, the present study made use of a multiple priming paradigm in which two primes either converged onto the single meaning of an unambiguous, lexically associated target (LION-STRIPES-TIGER) or diverged onto different meanings of an ambiguous target (KIDNEY-PIANO-ORGAN). In two experiments, participants either made lexical decisions to lateralized targets (Experiment 1) or made a semantic relatedness judgment between primes and targets (Experiment 2). In both tasks, for both ambiguous and unambiguous triplets we found equivalent priming strengths and patterns across the two visual fields, counter to the predictions of the coarse coding hypothesis. Priming patterns further suggested that both hemispheres made use of lexical level representations in the lexical decision task and semantic representations in the semantic judgment task.",
keywords = "Cerebral hemispheres, Coarse coding hypothesis, Lexical ambiguity, Semantic priming, Summation priming, Word processing",
author = "Padmapriya Kandhadai and Federmeier, {Kara D}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1153",
pages = "144--157",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres

T2 - The coarse coding hypothesis revisited

AU - Kandhadai, Padmapriya

AU - Federmeier, Kara D

PY - 2007/6/11

Y1 - 2007/6/11

N2 - The coarse coding hypothesis postulates that the cerebral hemispheres differ in their breadth of semantic activation, with the left hemisphere activating a narrow, focused semantic field and the right weakly activating a broader semantic field. In support of coarse coding, studies investigating priming for multiple senses of a lexically ambiguous word have reported a right hemisphere benefit. However, studies of mediated priming have failed to find a right hemisphere advantage for processing distantly linked, unambiguous words. To address this debate, the present study made use of a multiple priming paradigm in which two primes either converged onto the single meaning of an unambiguous, lexically associated target (LION-STRIPES-TIGER) or diverged onto different meanings of an ambiguous target (KIDNEY-PIANO-ORGAN). In two experiments, participants either made lexical decisions to lateralized targets (Experiment 1) or made a semantic relatedness judgment between primes and targets (Experiment 2). In both tasks, for both ambiguous and unambiguous triplets we found equivalent priming strengths and patterns across the two visual fields, counter to the predictions of the coarse coding hypothesis. Priming patterns further suggested that both hemispheres made use of lexical level representations in the lexical decision task and semantic representations in the semantic judgment task.

AB - The coarse coding hypothesis postulates that the cerebral hemispheres differ in their breadth of semantic activation, with the left hemisphere activating a narrow, focused semantic field and the right weakly activating a broader semantic field. In support of coarse coding, studies investigating priming for multiple senses of a lexically ambiguous word have reported a right hemisphere benefit. However, studies of mediated priming have failed to find a right hemisphere advantage for processing distantly linked, unambiguous words. To address this debate, the present study made use of a multiple priming paradigm in which two primes either converged onto the single meaning of an unambiguous, lexically associated target (LION-STRIPES-TIGER) or diverged onto different meanings of an ambiguous target (KIDNEY-PIANO-ORGAN). In two experiments, participants either made lexical decisions to lateralized targets (Experiment 1) or made a semantic relatedness judgment between primes and targets (Experiment 2). In both tasks, for both ambiguous and unambiguous triplets we found equivalent priming strengths and patterns across the two visual fields, counter to the predictions of the coarse coding hypothesis. Priming patterns further suggested that both hemispheres made use of lexical level representations in the lexical decision task and semantic representations in the semantic judgment task.

KW - Cerebral hemispheres

KW - Coarse coding hypothesis

KW - Lexical ambiguity

KW - Semantic priming

KW - Summation priming

KW - Word processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249051052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249051052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.046

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.046

M3 - Article

C2 - 17459344

AN - SCOPUS:34249051052

VL - 1153

SP - 144

EP - 157

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 1

ER -