TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple genes and the monophyly of ischnocera (Insecta: Phthiraptera)
AU - Johnson, Kevin P.
AU - Whiting, Michael F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The following individuals assisted in providing samples for this project: L. Durden, R. Moyle, J. Weckstein, R. J. Adams, E. Osnas, S. Meagher, D. Clayton, and S. Al-tamimi. Jared Helm provided assistance in sequencing 18S. R. J. Adams prepared slide mounts of voucher specimens and assisted with the identifications. R. DeSalle, M. Hardman, V. Smith, C. Taylor, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by NSF CAREER DEB-9703003 to D. H. Clayton and by NSF Grants DEB-9615269, DEB-9806349, and NSF CAREER award DEB-9983195 to M. F. Whiting. We thank the DNA Sequencing Facility at the University of Utah, supported in part by NCI Grant 5p30CA42014.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Whereas most traditional classifications identify Ischnocera as a major suborder of lice in the order Phthiraptera, a recent molecular study based on one gene did not recover monophyly of Ischnocera. In this study we test the monophyly of Ischnocera using sequences of portions of three different genes: two nuclear (EF1α and 18S) and one mitochondrial (COI). Analysis of EF1α and COI sequences did not recover monophyly of Ischnocera, but these genes provided little support for ischnoceran paraphyly because homoplasy is high among the divergent taxa included in this study. Analysis of 18S sequences recovered ischnoceran monophyly with strong support. Sequences from these three gene regions showed significant conflict with the partition homogeneity test, but this heterogeneity probably arises from the dramatic differences in substitution rates. In support of this conclusion, Kishino-Hasegawa tests of the EF1α and COI genes did not reject several trees containing ischnoceran monophyly. Combined analysis of all three gene regions supported monophyly of Ischnocera, although not as strongly as analysis of 18S by itself. In sum, although rapidly evolving genes can retain some phylogenetic signal for deep phylogenetic relationships, strong support for such relationships is likely to come from more slowly evolving genes.
AB - Whereas most traditional classifications identify Ischnocera as a major suborder of lice in the order Phthiraptera, a recent molecular study based on one gene did not recover monophyly of Ischnocera. In this study we test the monophyly of Ischnocera using sequences of portions of three different genes: two nuclear (EF1α and 18S) and one mitochondrial (COI). Analysis of EF1α and COI sequences did not recover monophyly of Ischnocera, but these genes provided little support for ischnoceran paraphyly because homoplasy is high among the divergent taxa included in this study. Analysis of 18S sequences recovered ischnoceran monophyly with strong support. Sequences from these three gene regions showed significant conflict with the partition homogeneity test, but this heterogeneity probably arises from the dramatic differences in substitution rates. In support of this conclusion, Kishino-Hasegawa tests of the EF1α and COI genes did not reject several trees containing ischnoceran monophyly. Combined analysis of all three gene regions supported monophyly of Ischnocera, although not as strongly as analysis of 18S by itself. In sum, although rapidly evolving genes can retain some phylogenetic signal for deep phylogenetic relationships, strong support for such relationships is likely to come from more slowly evolving genes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036355528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036355528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/mpev.2001.1028
DO - 10.1006/mpev.2001.1028
M3 - Article
C2 - 11796033
AN - SCOPUS:0036355528
SN - 1055-7903
VL - 22
SP - 101
EP - 110
JO - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
JF - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
IS - 1
ER -