Multigene phylogeny reveals eusociality evolved twice in vespid wasps

Heather M. Hines, James H. Hunt, Timothy K. O'Connor, Joseph J. Gillespie, Sydney A. Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Eusocial wasps of the family Vespidae are thought to have derived their social behavior from a common ancestor that had a rudimentary caste-containing social system. In support of this behavioral scenario, the leading phylogenetic hypothesis of Vespidae places the eusocial wasps (subfamilies Stenogastrinae, Polistinae, and Vespinae) as a derived monophyletic clade, thus implying a single origin of eusocial behavior. This perspective has shaped the investigation and interpretation of vespid social evolution for more than two decades. Here we report a phylogeny of Vespidae based on data from four nuclear gene fragments (18S and 28S ribosomal DNA, abdominal-A and RNA polymerase II) and representatives from all six extant subfamilies. In contrast to the current phylogenetic perspective, our results indicate two independent origins of vespid eusociality, once in the clade Polistinae+Vespinae and once in the Stenogastrinae. The stenogastrines appear as an early diverging clade distantly related to the vespines and polistines and thus evolved their distinctive form of social behavior from a different ancestor than that of Polistinae+Vespinae. These results support earlier views based on life history and behavior and have important implications for interpreting transitional stages in vespid social evolution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3295-3299
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume104
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 27 2007

Keywords

  • Hymenoptera
  • Molecular phylogenetics
  • Social behavior
  • Social insect evolution
  • Vespidae

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multigene phylogeny reveals eusociality evolved twice in vespid wasps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this