Multi-wave prospective examination of the stress-reactivity extension of response styles theory of depression in high-risk children and early adolescents

John R.Z. Abela, Benjamin L. Hankin, Dana M. Sheshko, Michael B. Fishman, Darren Stolow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The current study tested the stress-reactivity extension of response styles theory of depression (Nolen- Hoeksema Journal of Abnormal Psychology 100:569-582, 1991) in a sample of high-risk children and early adolescents from a vulnerability-stress perspective using a multi-wave longitudinal design. In addition, we examined whether obtained results varied as a function of either age or sex. During an initial assessment, 56 high-risk children (offspring of depressed parents; ages 7-14) completed measures assessing rumination and depressive symptoms. Children were subsequently given a handheld personal computer which signalled them to complete measures assessing depressive symptoms and negative events at six randomly selected times over an 8-week follow-up interval. In line with hypotheses, higher levels of rumination were associated with prospective elevations in depressive symptoms following the occurrence of negative events. Sex, but not age, moderated this association. Rumination was more strongly associated with elevations in depressive symptoms following the occurrence of negative events in girls than in boys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-287
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Keywords

  • Children
  • Depressive symptoms
  • Response styles theory
  • Rumination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-wave prospective examination of the stress-reactivity extension of response styles theory of depression in high-risk children and early adolescents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this