TY - GEN
T1 - Multi-Threshold Byzantine Fault Tolerance
AU - Momose, Atsuki
AU - Ren, Ling
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank our shepherd Julian Loss and the anonymous reviewers at ACM CCS 2021 for their helpful feedback. This work was supported in part by gifts from Novi and VMware.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 ACM.
PY - 2021/11/12
Y1 - 2021/11/12
N2 - Classic Byzantine fault tolerant (BFT) protocols are designed for a specific timing model, most often one of the following: synchronous, asynchronous or partially synchronous. It is well known that the timing model and fault tolerance threshold present inherent trade-offs. Synchronous protocols tolerate up to n/2 Byzantine faults, while asynchronous or partially synchronous protocols tolerate only up to n/3 Byzantine faults. In this work, we generalize the fault thresholds of BFT and introduce a new problem called multi-threshold BFT. Multi-threshold BFT has four separate fault thresholds for safety and liveness under synchrony and asynchrony (or partial-synchrony), respectively. Decomposing the fault thresholds in this way allows us to design protocols that provide meaningful fault tolerance under both synchrony and asynchrony (or partial synchrony). We establish tight fault thresholds bounds for multi-threshold BFT and present protocols achieving them. As an example, we show a BFT state machine replication (SMR) protocol that tolerates up to 2n/3 faults for safety under synchrony while tolerating up to n/3 faults for other scenarios (liveness under synchrony as well as safety and liveness under partial synchrony). This is strictly stronger than classic partially synchronous SMR protocols. We also present a general framework to transform known partially synchronous or asynchronous BFT SMR protocols to additionally enjoy the optimal 2n/3 fault tolerance for safety under synchrony.
AB - Classic Byzantine fault tolerant (BFT) protocols are designed for a specific timing model, most often one of the following: synchronous, asynchronous or partially synchronous. It is well known that the timing model and fault tolerance threshold present inherent trade-offs. Synchronous protocols tolerate up to n/2 Byzantine faults, while asynchronous or partially synchronous protocols tolerate only up to n/3 Byzantine faults. In this work, we generalize the fault thresholds of BFT and introduce a new problem called multi-threshold BFT. Multi-threshold BFT has four separate fault thresholds for safety and liveness under synchrony and asynchrony (or partial-synchrony), respectively. Decomposing the fault thresholds in this way allows us to design protocols that provide meaningful fault tolerance under both synchrony and asynchrony (or partial synchrony). We establish tight fault thresholds bounds for multi-threshold BFT and present protocols achieving them. As an example, we show a BFT state machine replication (SMR) protocol that tolerates up to 2n/3 faults for safety under synchrony while tolerating up to n/3 faults for other scenarios (liveness under synchrony as well as safety and liveness under partial synchrony). This is strictly stronger than classic partially synchronous SMR protocols. We also present a general framework to transform known partially synchronous or asynchronous BFT SMR protocols to additionally enjoy the optimal 2n/3 fault tolerance for safety under synchrony.
KW - blockchain
KW - byzantine fault tolerance
KW - distributed systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119352517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119352517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3460120.3484554
DO - 10.1145/3460120.3484554
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85119352517
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security
SP - 1686
EP - 1699
BT - CCS 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 27th ACM Annual Conference on Computer and Communication Security, CCS 2021
Y2 - 15 November 2021 through 19 November 2021
ER -