Multi-physics and multi-scale benchmarking and uncertainty quantification within OECD/NEA framework

M. Avramova, K. Ivanov, T. Kozlowski, I. Pasichnyk, W. Zwermann, K. Velkov, E. Royer, A. Yamaji, J. Gulliford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The development of multi-physics multi-scale coupled methodologies for Light Water Reactor (LWR) analysis requires comprehensive validation and verification procedures, which include well-established benchmarks developed in international cooperation. The Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has provided such framework, and over the years a number of LWR benchmarks have been developed and successfully conducted. The first set of NEA/OECD benchmarks that permits testing of the neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling, and verifying the capability of the coupled codes to analyze complex transients with coupled core/plant interactions have been completed and documented. These benchmarks provided a validation basis for the new generation of coupled "best-estimate" codes. The above mentioned OECD/NEA LWR benchmark activities have also stimulated follow up developments and benchmarks to test these developments. The models utilized have been improved when moving from one benchmark to the next and this created a need to validate them using high-quality experimental data. Second set of the NEA/OECD benchmarks have been initiated by the Expert Group on Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (EGUAM) at the Nuclear Science Committee (NSC), NEA/OECD to address the current trends in the development of LWR multi-physics and multi-scale modeling and simulation. These benchmarks include the following common features, which address some of the issues identified in the first set of OECD/NEA benchmarks: (a) utilization of high-quality experimental data; (b) refined local scale modeling in addition to global predictions; (c) more detailed comparisons and analysis; (d) including uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of modeling predictions. The paper presents each of these new benchmarks by providing description and discussion of comparative analysis of obtained results. Special attention is devoted to uncertainty propagation in LWR multi-physics and multi-scale simulations for design and safety evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-196
Number of pages19
JournalAnnals of Nuclear Energy
Volume84
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 28 2015

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Light water reactors
Nuclear energy
Physics
Economics
Uncertainty analysis
Hydraulic equipment
International cooperation
Sensitivity analysis
Uncertainty
Testing

Keywords

  • Benchmark
  • Multi-physics
  • Multi-scale
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Cite this

Multi-physics and multi-scale benchmarking and uncertainty quantification within OECD/NEA framework. / Avramova, M.; Ivanov, K.; Kozlowski, T.; Pasichnyk, I.; Zwermann, W.; Velkov, K.; Royer, E.; Yamaji, A.; Gulliford, J.

In: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 84, 28.07.2015, p. 178-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Avramova, M, Ivanov, K, Kozlowski, T, Pasichnyk, I, Zwermann, W, Velkov, K, Royer, E, Yamaji, A & Gulliford, J 2015, 'Multi-physics and multi-scale benchmarking and uncertainty quantification within OECD/NEA framework', Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 84, pp. 178-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.12.014
Avramova, M. ; Ivanov, K. ; Kozlowski, T. ; Pasichnyk, I. ; Zwermann, W. ; Velkov, K. ; Royer, E. ; Yamaji, A. ; Gulliford, J. / Multi-physics and multi-scale benchmarking and uncertainty quantification within OECD/NEA framework. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2015 ; Vol. 84. pp. 178-196.
@article{be533451eb2340918b0ab021b686b3d6,
title = "Multi-physics and multi-scale benchmarking and uncertainty quantification within OECD/NEA framework",
abstract = "The development of multi-physics multi-scale coupled methodologies for Light Water Reactor (LWR) analysis requires comprehensive validation and verification procedures, which include well-established benchmarks developed in international cooperation. The Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has provided such framework, and over the years a number of LWR benchmarks have been developed and successfully conducted. The first set of NEA/OECD benchmarks that permits testing of the neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling, and verifying the capability of the coupled codes to analyze complex transients with coupled core/plant interactions have been completed and documented. These benchmarks provided a validation basis for the new generation of coupled {"}best-estimate{"} codes. The above mentioned OECD/NEA LWR benchmark activities have also stimulated follow up developments and benchmarks to test these developments. The models utilized have been improved when moving from one benchmark to the next and this created a need to validate them using high-quality experimental data. Second set of the NEA/OECD benchmarks have been initiated by the Expert Group on Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (EGUAM) at the Nuclear Science Committee (NSC), NEA/OECD to address the current trends in the development of LWR multi-physics and multi-scale modeling and simulation. These benchmarks include the following common features, which address some of the issues identified in the first set of OECD/NEA benchmarks: (a) utilization of high-quality experimental data; (b) refined local scale modeling in addition to global predictions; (c) more detailed comparisons and analysis; (d) including uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of modeling predictions. The paper presents each of these new benchmarks by providing description and discussion of comparative analysis of obtained results. Special attention is devoted to uncertainty propagation in LWR multi-physics and multi-scale simulations for design and safety evaluations.",
keywords = "Benchmark, Multi-physics, Multi-scale, Uncertainty",
author = "M. Avramova and K. Ivanov and T. Kozlowski and I. Pasichnyk and W. Zwermann and K. Velkov and E. Royer and A. Yamaji and J. Gulliford",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.anucene.2014.12.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "178--196",
journal = "Annals of Nuclear Energy",
issn = "0306-4549",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-physics and multi-scale benchmarking and uncertainty quantification within OECD/NEA framework

AU - Avramova, M.

AU - Ivanov, K.

AU - Kozlowski, T.

AU - Pasichnyk, I.

AU - Zwermann, W.

AU - Velkov, K.

AU - Royer, E.

AU - Yamaji, A.

AU - Gulliford, J.

PY - 2015/7/28

Y1 - 2015/7/28

N2 - The development of multi-physics multi-scale coupled methodologies for Light Water Reactor (LWR) analysis requires comprehensive validation and verification procedures, which include well-established benchmarks developed in international cooperation. The Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has provided such framework, and over the years a number of LWR benchmarks have been developed and successfully conducted. The first set of NEA/OECD benchmarks that permits testing of the neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling, and verifying the capability of the coupled codes to analyze complex transients with coupled core/plant interactions have been completed and documented. These benchmarks provided a validation basis for the new generation of coupled "best-estimate" codes. The above mentioned OECD/NEA LWR benchmark activities have also stimulated follow up developments and benchmarks to test these developments. The models utilized have been improved when moving from one benchmark to the next and this created a need to validate them using high-quality experimental data. Second set of the NEA/OECD benchmarks have been initiated by the Expert Group on Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (EGUAM) at the Nuclear Science Committee (NSC), NEA/OECD to address the current trends in the development of LWR multi-physics and multi-scale modeling and simulation. These benchmarks include the following common features, which address some of the issues identified in the first set of OECD/NEA benchmarks: (a) utilization of high-quality experimental data; (b) refined local scale modeling in addition to global predictions; (c) more detailed comparisons and analysis; (d) including uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of modeling predictions. The paper presents each of these new benchmarks by providing description and discussion of comparative analysis of obtained results. Special attention is devoted to uncertainty propagation in LWR multi-physics and multi-scale simulations for design and safety evaluations.

AB - The development of multi-physics multi-scale coupled methodologies for Light Water Reactor (LWR) analysis requires comprehensive validation and verification procedures, which include well-established benchmarks developed in international cooperation. The Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has provided such framework, and over the years a number of LWR benchmarks have been developed and successfully conducted. The first set of NEA/OECD benchmarks that permits testing of the neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling, and verifying the capability of the coupled codes to analyze complex transients with coupled core/plant interactions have been completed and documented. These benchmarks provided a validation basis for the new generation of coupled "best-estimate" codes. The above mentioned OECD/NEA LWR benchmark activities have also stimulated follow up developments and benchmarks to test these developments. The models utilized have been improved when moving from one benchmark to the next and this created a need to validate them using high-quality experimental data. Second set of the NEA/OECD benchmarks have been initiated by the Expert Group on Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (EGUAM) at the Nuclear Science Committee (NSC), NEA/OECD to address the current trends in the development of LWR multi-physics and multi-scale modeling and simulation. These benchmarks include the following common features, which address some of the issues identified in the first set of OECD/NEA benchmarks: (a) utilization of high-quality experimental data; (b) refined local scale modeling in addition to global predictions; (c) more detailed comparisons and analysis; (d) including uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of modeling predictions. The paper presents each of these new benchmarks by providing description and discussion of comparative analysis of obtained results. Special attention is devoted to uncertainty propagation in LWR multi-physics and multi-scale simulations for design and safety evaluations.

KW - Benchmark

KW - Multi-physics

KW - Multi-scale

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937824352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937824352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.12.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937824352

VL - 84

SP - 178

EP - 196

JO - Annals of Nuclear Energy

JF - Annals of Nuclear Energy

SN - 0306-4549

ER -