Moving from recitation to open-format literature discussion in Chinese classrooms

Yahua Cheng, Jie Zhang, Hong Li, Richard Anderson, Fengjiao Ding, Kim Nguyen-Jahiel, Hua Shu, Xinchun Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


A study involving 106 fourth graders and two teachers from a school in Beijing investigated the impact of a peer-led, open-format discussion approach, called collaborative reasoning (CR), on students’ reading comprehension and teacher’s professional learning. Mixed results of effects of CR on children’s reading comprehension were found. After participating in eight discussions over an eight-week period, the CR group performed significantly better than the control group on the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study constructed-response items requiring integrating and evaluating information, but no better on multiple-choice items calling for information retrieval and simple inferences. No CR group’s advantage was found on the National Assessment of Educational Progress items. Compared to the baseline discussions prior to the intervention, CR increased the volume, complexity, and fluency of student talk, decreased teacher talk and teacher control of topic. Both CR teachers successfully altered the traditional recitation discourse pattern and adapted to an open-format discussion. CR teachers’ weekly reflections and interviews showed that teachers experienced four developmental stages from being lost to applying CR in subsequent reading instruction practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)643-664
Number of pages22
JournalInstructional Science
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015


  • Chinese children
  • Collaborative reasoning
  • Reading comprehension
  • Small-group discussions
  • Teacher learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Moving from recitation to open-format literature discussion in Chinese classrooms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this