TY - JOUR
T1 - “Move forward”
T2 - A marginalia analysis of farmers’ mental health management strategies
AU - Billington, Asa
AU - Cuthbertson, Courtney
AU - Iwinski, Sam
AU - Hu, Yifan
AU - Krishnaswamy, Madhulika
AU - Rudolphi, Josie
N1 - This research was supported by USDA NIFA under agreement 2020-70028-32728. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. government determination or policy.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Human health in agriculture is essential to the sustainability of the field. Mental health of people who work in agriculture has been concerning to community members, researchers, and practitioners as suicide rates have been higher than the general population. This study involved surveys of agricultural producers about their mental health, barriers to accessing care, farming experience, and demographic information. In total, n = 67 surveys were returned with comments or markings outside of the structure of the survey (marginalia). We conducted a qualitative analysis of this unique form of data to understand themes related to mental health in agriculture. Using grounded theory techniques, the analysis revealed themes related to dealing with mental health, and more specifically, three subthemes of self-reliance, religion, and distancing/minimizing mental health. Findings highlight how dealing with mental health for this subgroup of agricultural producers meant using one's own resources and not relying on other people or healthcare for assistance or support. Findings from the current study can be used to align outreach efforts to support people who work in agriculture and demonstrate the value of unanticipated data, particularly in relation to hard-to-reach populations such as agricultural producers.
AB - Human health in agriculture is essential to the sustainability of the field. Mental health of people who work in agriculture has been concerning to community members, researchers, and practitioners as suicide rates have been higher than the general population. This study involved surveys of agricultural producers about their mental health, barriers to accessing care, farming experience, and demographic information. In total, n = 67 surveys were returned with comments or markings outside of the structure of the survey (marginalia). We conducted a qualitative analysis of this unique form of data to understand themes related to mental health in agriculture. Using grounded theory techniques, the analysis revealed themes related to dealing with mental health, and more specifically, three subthemes of self-reliance, religion, and distancing/minimizing mental health. Findings highlight how dealing with mental health for this subgroup of agricultural producers meant using one's own resources and not relying on other people or healthcare for assistance or support. Findings from the current study can be used to align outreach efforts to support people who work in agriculture and demonstrate the value of unanticipated data, particularly in relation to hard-to-reach populations such as agricultural producers.
KW - Farm stress
KW - Marginalia
KW - Mental health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002569655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105002569655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103649
DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103649
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002569655
SN - 0743-0167
VL - 117
JO - Journal of Rural Studies
JF - Journal of Rural Studies
M1 - 103649
ER -