Abstract
Banks and related financial institutions often have two separate subsidiaries that make loans of similar type but differing risk, for example, a bank and a finance company, or a "good bank/bad bank" structure. Such "bipartite" structures may prevent risk shifting, in which banks misuse their flexibility in choosing and monitoring loans to exploit their debt holders. By "insulating" safer loans from riskier loans, a bipartite structure reduces risk-shifting incentives in the safer subsidiary. Bipartite structures are more likely to dominate unitary structures as the downside from riskier loans is higher or as expected profits from the efficient loan mix are lower.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2531-2575 |
Number of pages | 45 |
Journal | Journal of Finance |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2004 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics