TY - JOUR
T1 - Monohalogenated acetamide-induced cellular stress and genotoxicity are related to electrophilic softness and thiol/thiolate reactivity
AU - Pals, Justin A.
AU - Wagner, Elizabeth D.
AU - Plewa, Michael J.
AU - Xia, Menghang
AU - Attene-Ramos, Matias S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - Haloacetamides (HAMs) are cytotoxic, genotoxic, and mutagenic byproducts of drinking water disinfection. They are soft electrophilic compounds that form covalent bonds with the free thiol/thiolate in cysteine residues through an SN2 reaction mechanism. Toxicity of the monohalogenated HAMs (iodoacetamide, IAM; bromoacetamide, BAM; or chloroacetamide, CAM) varied depending on the halogen substituent. The aim of this research was to investigate how the halogen atom affects the reactivity and toxicological properties of HAMs, measured as induction of oxidative/electrophilic stress response and genotoxicity. Additionally, we wanted to determine how well in silico estimates of electrophilic softness matched thiol/thiolate reactivity and in vitro toxicological endpoints. Each of the HAMs significantly induced nuclear Rad51 accumulation and ARE signaling activity compared to a negative control. The rank order of effect was IAM > BAM > CAM for Rad51, and BAM ≈ IAM > CAM for ARE. In general, electrophilic softness and in chemico thiol/thiolate reactivity provided a qualitative indicator of toxicity, as the softer electrophiles IAM and BAM were more thiol/thiolate reactive and were more toxic than CAM.
AB - Haloacetamides (HAMs) are cytotoxic, genotoxic, and mutagenic byproducts of drinking water disinfection. They are soft electrophilic compounds that form covalent bonds with the free thiol/thiolate in cysteine residues through an SN2 reaction mechanism. Toxicity of the monohalogenated HAMs (iodoacetamide, IAM; bromoacetamide, BAM; or chloroacetamide, CAM) varied depending on the halogen substituent. The aim of this research was to investigate how the halogen atom affects the reactivity and toxicological properties of HAMs, measured as induction of oxidative/electrophilic stress response and genotoxicity. Additionally, we wanted to determine how well in silico estimates of electrophilic softness matched thiol/thiolate reactivity and in vitro toxicological endpoints. Each of the HAMs significantly induced nuclear Rad51 accumulation and ARE signaling activity compared to a negative control. The rank order of effect was IAM > BAM > CAM for Rad51, and BAM ≈ IAM > CAM for ARE. In general, electrophilic softness and in chemico thiol/thiolate reactivity provided a qualitative indicator of toxicity, as the softer electrophiles IAM and BAM were more thiol/thiolate reactive and were more toxic than CAM.
KW - DNA damage
KW - Drinking water disinfection byproducts
KW - Haloacetamide
KW - Oxidative stress
KW - Soft electrophile
KW - Toxicity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019592190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019592190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jes.2017.04.027
DO - 10.1016/j.jes.2017.04.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 28774613
AN - SCOPUS:85019592190
SN - 1001-0742
VL - 58
SP - 224
EP - 230
JO - Journal of environmental sciences (China)
JF - Journal of environmental sciences (China)
ER -