TY - JOUR
T1 - Models for right-turn-on-red and their effects on intersection delay
AU - Abu-Lebdeh, Ghassan
AU - Benekohal, Rahim F.
AU - Al-Omari, Bashar
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Models to estimate right-turn-on-red (RTOR) volumes at intersections with exclusive right-turn (RT) lance are devoloped, and the effects of RTOR volumes on computed delay are assessed. The important variables in these models are the RT volume, followed by green-time-to-cycle (G/C) ratio, volume of conflicting traffic, and whether there is a protected phase for opposing left-turning vehicals. The estimated RTOR increased as the RTs increased. However, it decreased as G/C and the volume of conflicting traffic increased. Result show that not accouning for RTOR volumes can lead to a significant difference in delay estimates for RT lanes and, to a lesser extent, on the corresponding approaches. For RT lanes, in one-half of the cases the difference was greater than 5 percent, in more than one-quarter of the cases the difference was greater than 10 percent, and in at least one of eight cases the difference was greater than 20 percet. Differences for individual cases ranged between 0 and 130 percent, with an average of 12 percent. For approaches, the average delay difference -2 and 78 percent. As recommended by the Highway Capacity Manual, actual field counts of RTOR volume should be used whenever available. However, in the absence of such counts, the models developed here can be used and hence should be considered in capacity analysis procedures.
AB - Models to estimate right-turn-on-red (RTOR) volumes at intersections with exclusive right-turn (RT) lance are devoloped, and the effects of RTOR volumes on computed delay are assessed. The important variables in these models are the RT volume, followed by green-time-to-cycle (G/C) ratio, volume of conflicting traffic, and whether there is a protected phase for opposing left-turning vehicals. The estimated RTOR increased as the RTs increased. However, it decreased as G/C and the volume of conflicting traffic increased. Result show that not accouning for RTOR volumes can lead to a significant difference in delay estimates for RT lanes and, to a lesser extent, on the corresponding approaches. For RT lanes, in one-half of the cases the difference was greater than 5 percent, in more than one-quarter of the cases the difference was greater than 10 percent, and in at least one of eight cases the difference was greater than 20 percet. Differences for individual cases ranged between 0 and 130 percent, with an average of 12 percent. For approaches, the average delay difference -2 and 78 percent. As recommended by the Highway Capacity Manual, actual field counts of RTOR volume should be used whenever available. However, in the absence of such counts, the models developed here can be used and hence should be considered in capacity analysis procedures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3943075131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3943075131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3141/1572-16
DO - 10.3141/1572-16
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:3943075131
SN - 0361-1981
SP - 131
EP - 139
JO - Transportation Research Record
JF - Transportation Research Record
IS - 1572
ER -