Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: Why an 'aid' can (and should) go unused

A. Kirlik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Task-offload aids (e.g., an autopilot, an 'intelligent' assistant) can be selectively engaged by the human operator to dynamically delegate tasks to automation. Introducing such aids eliminates some task demands but creates new ones associated with programming, engaging, and disengaging the aiding device via an interface. The burdens associated with managing automation can sometimes outweigh the potential benefits of automation to improved system performance. Aid design parameters and features of the overall multitask context combine to determine whether or not a task-offload aid will effectively support the operator. A modeling and sensitivity analysis approach is presented that identifies effective strategies for human-automation interaction as a function of three task-context parameters and three aid design parameters. The analysis and modeling approaches provide resources for predicting how a well-adapted operator will use a given task-offload aid, and for specifying aid design features that ensure that automation will provide effective operator support in a multitask environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-242
Number of pages22
JournalHuman Factors
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: Why an 'aid' can (and should) go unused'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this