Model averaging and persistent disagreement

In Koo Cho, Kenneth Kasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The authors consider the following scenario: Two agents construct models of an endogenous price process. One agent thinks the data are stationary, the other thinks the data are nonstationary. A policymaker combines forecasts from the two models using a recursive Bayesian model averaging procedure. The actual (but unknown) price process depends on the policymaker’s forecasts. The authors find that if the policymaker has complete faith in the stationary model, then beliefs and outcomes converge to the stationary rational expectations equilibrium. However, even a grain of doubt about stationarity will cause beliefs to settle on the nonstationary model, where prices experience large self-confirming deviations away from the stationary equilibrium. The authors show that it would take centuries of data before agents were able to detect their model misspecifications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-294
Number of pages16
JournalFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review
Volume99
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Model averaging and persistent disagreement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this