Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations

Kevin McCarthy, Patrick McCarthy, Ning Wu, Andrew G Alleyne, Justin Koeln, Soumya Patnaik, Stephen Emo, Joshua Cory

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

As the cost and complexity of modern aircraft systems advance, emphasis has been placed on model-based design as a means for cost effective subsystem optimization. The success of the model-based design process is contingent on accurate prediction of the system response prior to hardware fabrication, but the level of fidelity necessary to achieve this objective is often called into question. Identifying the key benefits and limitations of model fidelity along with the key parameters that drive model accuracy will help improve the model-based design process enabling low cost, optimized solutions for current and future programs. In this effort, the accuracy and capability of a vapor cycle system (VCS) model were considered from a model fidelity and parameter accuracy standpoint. A range of model fidelity was evaluated in terms of accuracy, capability, simulation speed, and development time. Inability to implement control strategies and reliance on external sources for operating assumptions were seen as significant limitations of the lower fidelity models. Characteristics of the highest fidelity model were noted for their ability to accurately capture the dynamic nature of the hardware data through physics based modeling and control implementation, but at a cost in development time and simulation speed. In addition to characterization of model accuracy and capability, design of experiment results demonstrated that parameters, such as refrigerant charge, compressor efficiency, and heat exchanger heat transfer coefficients are more significant to model accuracy than parameters such as pipe length or heat exchanger dimensions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSAE Technical Papers
Volume2014-September
Issue numberSeptember
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 2014
EventSAE 2014 Aerospace Systems and Technology Conference, ASTC 2014 - Cincinnati, United States
Duration: Sep 23 2014Sep 25 2014

Fingerprint

Vapors
Heat exchangers
Costs
Hardware
Refrigerants
Design of experiments
Heat transfer coefficients
Compressors
Physics
Pipe
Aircraft
Fabrication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Pollution
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

McCarthy, K., McCarthy, P., Wu, N., Alleyne, A. G., Koeln, J., Patnaik, S., ... Cory, J. (2014). Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations. SAE Technical Papers, 2014-September(September). https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2140

Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations. / McCarthy, Kevin; McCarthy, Patrick; Wu, Ning; Alleyne, Andrew G; Koeln, Justin; Patnaik, Soumya; Emo, Stephen; Cory, Joshua.

In: SAE Technical Papers, Vol. 2014-September, No. September, 16.09.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

McCarthy, K, McCarthy, P, Wu, N, Alleyne, AG, Koeln, J, Patnaik, S, Emo, S & Cory, J 2014, 'Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations', SAE Technical Papers, vol. 2014-September, no. September. https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2140
McCarthy K, McCarthy P, Wu N, Alleyne AG, Koeln J, Patnaik S et al. Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations. SAE Technical Papers. 2014 Sep 16;2014-September(September). https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2140
McCarthy, Kevin ; McCarthy, Patrick ; Wu, Ning ; Alleyne, Andrew G ; Koeln, Justin ; Patnaik, Soumya ; Emo, Stephen ; Cory, Joshua. / Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations. In: SAE Technical Papers. 2014 ; Vol. 2014-September, No. September.
@article{e32454da6d084929ac2314393bcd42ec,
title = "Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations",
abstract = "As the cost and complexity of modern aircraft systems advance, emphasis has been placed on model-based design as a means for cost effective subsystem optimization. The success of the model-based design process is contingent on accurate prediction of the system response prior to hardware fabrication, but the level of fidelity necessary to achieve this objective is often called into question. Identifying the key benefits and limitations of model fidelity along with the key parameters that drive model accuracy will help improve the model-based design process enabling low cost, optimized solutions for current and future programs. In this effort, the accuracy and capability of a vapor cycle system (VCS) model were considered from a model fidelity and parameter accuracy standpoint. A range of model fidelity was evaluated in terms of accuracy, capability, simulation speed, and development time. Inability to implement control strategies and reliance on external sources for operating assumptions were seen as significant limitations of the lower fidelity models. Characteristics of the highest fidelity model were noted for their ability to accurately capture the dynamic nature of the hardware data through physics based modeling and control implementation, but at a cost in development time and simulation speed. In addition to characterization of model accuracy and capability, design of experiment results demonstrated that parameters, such as refrigerant charge, compressor efficiency, and heat exchanger heat transfer coefficients are more significant to model accuracy than parameters such as pipe length or heat exchanger dimensions.",
author = "Kevin McCarthy and Patrick McCarthy and Ning Wu and Alleyne, {Andrew G} and Justin Koeln and Soumya Patnaik and Stephen Emo and Joshua Cory",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.4271/2014-01-2140",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2014-September",
journal = "SAE Technical Papers",
issn = "0148-7191",
publisher = "SAE International",
number = "September",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Model accuracy of variable fidelity vapor cycle system simulations

AU - McCarthy, Kevin

AU - McCarthy, Patrick

AU - Wu, Ning

AU - Alleyne, Andrew G

AU - Koeln, Justin

AU - Patnaik, Soumya

AU - Emo, Stephen

AU - Cory, Joshua

PY - 2014/9/16

Y1 - 2014/9/16

N2 - As the cost and complexity of modern aircraft systems advance, emphasis has been placed on model-based design as a means for cost effective subsystem optimization. The success of the model-based design process is contingent on accurate prediction of the system response prior to hardware fabrication, but the level of fidelity necessary to achieve this objective is often called into question. Identifying the key benefits and limitations of model fidelity along with the key parameters that drive model accuracy will help improve the model-based design process enabling low cost, optimized solutions for current and future programs. In this effort, the accuracy and capability of a vapor cycle system (VCS) model were considered from a model fidelity and parameter accuracy standpoint. A range of model fidelity was evaluated in terms of accuracy, capability, simulation speed, and development time. Inability to implement control strategies and reliance on external sources for operating assumptions were seen as significant limitations of the lower fidelity models. Characteristics of the highest fidelity model were noted for their ability to accurately capture the dynamic nature of the hardware data through physics based modeling and control implementation, but at a cost in development time and simulation speed. In addition to characterization of model accuracy and capability, design of experiment results demonstrated that parameters, such as refrigerant charge, compressor efficiency, and heat exchanger heat transfer coefficients are more significant to model accuracy than parameters such as pipe length or heat exchanger dimensions.

AB - As the cost and complexity of modern aircraft systems advance, emphasis has been placed on model-based design as a means for cost effective subsystem optimization. The success of the model-based design process is contingent on accurate prediction of the system response prior to hardware fabrication, but the level of fidelity necessary to achieve this objective is often called into question. Identifying the key benefits and limitations of model fidelity along with the key parameters that drive model accuracy will help improve the model-based design process enabling low cost, optimized solutions for current and future programs. In this effort, the accuracy and capability of a vapor cycle system (VCS) model were considered from a model fidelity and parameter accuracy standpoint. A range of model fidelity was evaluated in terms of accuracy, capability, simulation speed, and development time. Inability to implement control strategies and reliance on external sources for operating assumptions were seen as significant limitations of the lower fidelity models. Characteristics of the highest fidelity model were noted for their ability to accurately capture the dynamic nature of the hardware data through physics based modeling and control implementation, but at a cost in development time and simulation speed. In addition to characterization of model accuracy and capability, design of experiment results demonstrated that parameters, such as refrigerant charge, compressor efficiency, and heat exchanger heat transfer coefficients are more significant to model accuracy than parameters such as pipe length or heat exchanger dimensions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937791376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937791376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4271/2014-01-2140

DO - 10.4271/2014-01-2140

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84937791376

VL - 2014-September

JO - SAE Technical Papers

JF - SAE Technical Papers

SN - 0148-7191

IS - September

ER -