TY - JOUR
T1 - Mitochondrial ATP generation is more proteome efficient than glycolysis
AU - Shen, Yihui
AU - Dinh, Hoang V.
AU - Cruz, Edward R.
AU - Chen, Zihong
AU - Bartman, Caroline R.
AU - Xiao, Tianxia
AU - Call, Catherine M.
AU - Ryseck, Rolf Peter
AU - Pratas, Jimmy
AU - Weilandt, Daniel
AU - Baron, Heide
AU - Subramanian, Arjuna
AU - Fatma, Zia
AU - Wu, Zong Yen
AU - Dwaraknath, Sudharsan
AU - Hendry, John I.
AU - Tran, Vinh G.
AU - Yang, Lifeng
AU - Yoshikuni, Yasuo
AU - Zhao, Huimin
AU - Maranas, Costas D.
AU - Wühr, Martin
AU - Rabinowitz, Joshua D.
N1 - We thank members of the Rabinowitz lab for discussions about experiments and the manuscript, S. Silverman and J. Avalos for the yeast strains, L. Ryazanova for help with the proteomics experiment, P. F. Suthers for discussion on the genome-scale model, M. Gupta for discussion of protein regulation, N. Piyush and Z. Zhang for advice on competitive fitness and R. Knowles for discussions on chemical kinetics. This work was funded by Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0018260 to J.D.R., M.W., C.D.M., H.Z. and Y.Y.; the DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation DE-SC0018420 to J.D.R., C.D.M. and H.Z.; DOE DE-AC02-05CH1123 to Z.-Y.W., S.D., and Y.Y.; Ludwig Cancer Research funding to J.D.R.; NIH 35GM128813 and P30CA072720 to M.W.; Princeton Catalysis Initiative to M.W.; an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to E.R.C.; Princeton University\u2019s Summer Undergraduate Research Program to H.B. and A.S. and the Damon Runyon Foundation/Mark Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship and NIH K99CA273517 to C.R.B. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US DOE.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Metabolic efficiency profoundly influences organismal fitness. Nonphotosynthetic organisms, from yeast to mammals, derive usable energy primarily through glycolysis and respiration. Although respiration is more energy efficient, some cells favor glycolysis even when oxygen is available (aerobic glycolysis, Warburg effect). A leading explanation is that glycolysis is more efficient in terms of ATP production per unit mass of protein (that is, faster). Through quantitative flux analysis and proteomics, we find, however, that mitochondrial respiration is actually more proteome efficient than aerobic glycolysis. This is shown across yeast strains, T cells, cancer cells, and tissues and tumors in vivo. Instead of aerobic glycolysis being valuable for fast ATP production, it correlates with high glycolytic protein expression, which promotes hypoxic growth. Aerobic glycolytic yeasts do not excel at aerobic growth but outgrow respiratory cells during oxygen limitation. We accordingly propose that aerobic glycolysis emerges from cells maintaining a proteome conducive to both aerobic and hypoxic growth. (Figure presented.)
AB - Metabolic efficiency profoundly influences organismal fitness. Nonphotosynthetic organisms, from yeast to mammals, derive usable energy primarily through glycolysis and respiration. Although respiration is more energy efficient, some cells favor glycolysis even when oxygen is available (aerobic glycolysis, Warburg effect). A leading explanation is that glycolysis is more efficient in terms of ATP production per unit mass of protein (that is, faster). Through quantitative flux analysis and proteomics, we find, however, that mitochondrial respiration is actually more proteome efficient than aerobic glycolysis. This is shown across yeast strains, T cells, cancer cells, and tissues and tumors in vivo. Instead of aerobic glycolysis being valuable for fast ATP production, it correlates with high glycolytic protein expression, which promotes hypoxic growth. Aerobic glycolytic yeasts do not excel at aerobic growth but outgrow respiratory cells during oxygen limitation. We accordingly propose that aerobic glycolysis emerges from cells maintaining a proteome conducive to both aerobic and hypoxic growth. (Figure presented.)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186887218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186887218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41589-024-01571-y
DO - 10.1038/s41589-024-01571-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 38448734
AN - SCOPUS:85186887218
SN - 1552-4450
VL - 20
SP - 1123
EP - 1132
JO - Nature chemical biology
JF - Nature chemical biology
IS - 9
ER -