TY - GEN
T1 - Mission Performance Assessment of Multimode Propulsion for Satellite Servicing Applications
AU - Falcone, Giusy
AU - Engel, Daniel L.
AU - Cortinovis, Marta
AU - Ryan, Charles N.
AU - Rovey, Joshua L.
AU - Putnam, Zachary R.
AU - Berg, Steven
AU - Lembeck, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We assess the mission performance of a multimode (monopropellant-electrospray dual-mode) propulsion system relative to current state-of-the-art chemical, electric, and hybrid chemical-electric propulsion systems for satellite servicing applications. Performance is assessed for both low-Earth orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 100 kg) and geosyn-chronous orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 1000 kg). First-order spacecraft sizing routines are developed to determine spacecraft properties for each propulsion system option based on historical data, propulsion system properties, and physical and geometric constraints. The overall servicing missions are decomposed into a set of discrete maneuvers for both servicer concepts. Simulations are developed for each ma-neuver and propulsion system to determine flight performance, including ΔV and time of flight. Finally, metrics of comparison between the different propulsion system options are proposed to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of each propulsion system option over the candidate mission scenarios. Mission scenarios are composed of admissible sequences of modeled maneuvers. Comparison metrics are then used to highlight the costs and benefits of the assessed propulsion system options relative to each other. Results indicate that the hybrid and multimode systems provide significant mission flexibility for satellite servicing applications, but the multimode does so with a significantly lower structural ratio.
AB - We assess the mission performance of a multimode (monopropellant-electrospray dual-mode) propulsion system relative to current state-of-the-art chemical, electric, and hybrid chemical-electric propulsion systems for satellite servicing applications. Performance is assessed for both low-Earth orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 100 kg) and geosyn-chronous orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 1000 kg). First-order spacecraft sizing routines are developed to determine spacecraft properties for each propulsion system option based on historical data, propulsion system properties, and physical and geometric constraints. The overall servicing missions are decomposed into a set of discrete maneuvers for both servicer concepts. Simulations are developed for each ma-neuver and propulsion system to determine flight performance, including ΔV and time of flight. Finally, metrics of comparison between the different propulsion system options are proposed to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of each propulsion system option over the candidate mission scenarios. Mission scenarios are composed of admissible sequences of modeled maneuvers. Comparison metrics are then used to highlight the costs and benefits of the assessed propulsion system options relative to each other. Results indicate that the hybrid and multimode systems provide significant mission flexibility for satellite servicing applications, but the multimode does so with a significantly lower structural ratio.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137594428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137594428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843839
DO - 10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843839
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85137594428
T3 - IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings
BT - 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference, AERO 2022
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference, AERO 2022
Y2 - 5 March 2022 through 12 March 2022
ER -