Minimum parking requirements and housing affordability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A growing consensus argues that minimum parking requirements (MPRs) make housing more expensive. This paper examines two claims from this discussion: (1) that MPRs discourage the construction of small units; (2) that the costs of building required parking are “passed on” to buyers and renters in the form of higher prices and rents. However, the mechanisms behind these two effects have never been made explicit in the literature. This paper proposes, for each claim, a plausible mechanism relying on the specific choices of housing suppliers and consumers. We propose that MPRs discourage small units because they eliminate the most profitable floorspace/parking bundle to supply to relatively lower-income households. We propose that parking costs may be passed on by reducing the supply of housing on offer at a given price.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1309-1321
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Transport and Land Use
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

parking
Parking
choice of housing
housing
costs
rent
supplier
low income
supply
household income
cost
Costs
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Transportation
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Minimum parking requirements and housing affordability. / Lehe, Lewis.

In: Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 1309-1321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b0368b6314f43028f84e82691e30cb6,
title = "Minimum parking requirements and housing affordability",
abstract = "A growing consensus argues that minimum parking requirements (MPRs) make housing more expensive. This paper examines two claims from this discussion: (1) that MPRs discourage the construction of small units; (2) that the costs of building required parking are “passed on” to buyers and renters in the form of higher prices and rents. However, the mechanisms behind these two effects have never been made explicit in the literature. This paper proposes, for each claim, a plausible mechanism relying on the specific choices of housing suppliers and consumers. We propose that MPRs discourage small units because they eliminate the most profitable floorspace/parking bundle to supply to relatively lower-income households. We propose that parking costs may be passed on by reducing the supply of housing on offer at a given price.",
author = "Lewis Lehe",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5198/jtlu.2018.1340",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "1309--1321",
journal = "Journal of Transport and Land Use",
issn = "1938-7849",
publisher = "University of Minnesota",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimum parking requirements and housing affordability

AU - Lehe, Lewis

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - A growing consensus argues that minimum parking requirements (MPRs) make housing more expensive. This paper examines two claims from this discussion: (1) that MPRs discourage the construction of small units; (2) that the costs of building required parking are “passed on” to buyers and renters in the form of higher prices and rents. However, the mechanisms behind these two effects have never been made explicit in the literature. This paper proposes, for each claim, a plausible mechanism relying on the specific choices of housing suppliers and consumers. We propose that MPRs discourage small units because they eliminate the most profitable floorspace/parking bundle to supply to relatively lower-income households. We propose that parking costs may be passed on by reducing the supply of housing on offer at a given price.

AB - A growing consensus argues that minimum parking requirements (MPRs) make housing more expensive. This paper examines two claims from this discussion: (1) that MPRs discourage the construction of small units; (2) that the costs of building required parking are “passed on” to buyers and renters in the form of higher prices and rents. However, the mechanisms behind these two effects have never been made explicit in the literature. This paper proposes, for each claim, a plausible mechanism relying on the specific choices of housing suppliers and consumers. We propose that MPRs discourage small units because they eliminate the most profitable floorspace/parking bundle to supply to relatively lower-income households. We propose that parking costs may be passed on by reducing the supply of housing on offer at a given price.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069932201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069932201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5198/jtlu.2018.1340

DO - 10.5198/jtlu.2018.1340

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069932201

VL - 11

SP - 1309

EP - 1321

JO - Journal of Transport and Land Use

JF - Journal of Transport and Land Use

SN - 1938-7849

IS - 1

ER -