Mikhail Bakhtin and the rhetorical tradition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over the course of the past decade, the work of Russian literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin has exerted an increasing influence in rhetorical studies. This essay explores the ways in which rhetorical scholars have embraced Mikhail Bakhtin as a rhetorical theorist in spite of the fact that he disdained rhetoric. The first section of the essay examines the concept of tradition, elucidates three definitions of the rhetorical tradition commonly available to theorists, and explains the processes through which these definitions articulate as rhetorical theorists even those people who attack rhetoric. The essay then turns to the rhetorical reception of Mikhail Bakhtin, critiques the strategies that frame him as a rhetorician, and offers an alternative reading of his key discussion of rhetoric and of the rhetorical tradition in general. The conclusion argues that the reception of Bakhtin suggests a pattern in rhetorical studies. As rhetoricians encounter theorists who condemn rhetoric, they tend to defer the instrumental aspect of rhetoric, its potential for manipulation, in favor of a more benign view of rhetorical action. It is dangerous to disregard the danger of rhetoric in pursuit of a higher status for rhetoric.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-277
Number of pages19
JournalQuarterly Journal of Speech
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

rhetoric
Rhetoric
Mikhail Bakhtin
Rhetorical Tradition
manipulation
Theorists

Keywords

  • History of rhetoric
  • Mikhail Bakhtin
  • Rhetorical criticism
  • Rhetorical theory
  • Rhetorical tradition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education

Cite this

Mikhail Bakhtin and the rhetorical tradition. / Murphy, John M.

In: Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 87, No. 3, 08.2001, p. 259-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{010fcc1289c74569b9f8108aeceacb26,
title = "Mikhail Bakhtin and the rhetorical tradition",
abstract = "Over the course of the past decade, the work of Russian literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin has exerted an increasing influence in rhetorical studies. This essay explores the ways in which rhetorical scholars have embraced Mikhail Bakhtin as a rhetorical theorist in spite of the fact that he disdained rhetoric. The first section of the essay examines the concept of tradition, elucidates three definitions of the rhetorical tradition commonly available to theorists, and explains the processes through which these definitions articulate as rhetorical theorists even those people who attack rhetoric. The essay then turns to the rhetorical reception of Mikhail Bakhtin, critiques the strategies that frame him as a rhetorician, and offers an alternative reading of his key discussion of rhetoric and of the rhetorical tradition in general. The conclusion argues that the reception of Bakhtin suggests a pattern in rhetorical studies. As rhetoricians encounter theorists who condemn rhetoric, they tend to defer the instrumental aspect of rhetoric, its potential for manipulation, in favor of a more benign view of rhetorical action. It is dangerous to disregard the danger of rhetoric in pursuit of a higher status for rhetoric.",
keywords = "History of rhetoric, Mikhail Bakhtin, Rhetorical criticism, Rhetorical theory, Rhetorical tradition",
author = "Murphy, {John M}",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/00335630109384336",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "259--277",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Speech",
issn = "0033-5630",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mikhail Bakhtin and the rhetorical tradition

AU - Murphy, John M

PY - 2001/8

Y1 - 2001/8

N2 - Over the course of the past decade, the work of Russian literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin has exerted an increasing influence in rhetorical studies. This essay explores the ways in which rhetorical scholars have embraced Mikhail Bakhtin as a rhetorical theorist in spite of the fact that he disdained rhetoric. The first section of the essay examines the concept of tradition, elucidates three definitions of the rhetorical tradition commonly available to theorists, and explains the processes through which these definitions articulate as rhetorical theorists even those people who attack rhetoric. The essay then turns to the rhetorical reception of Mikhail Bakhtin, critiques the strategies that frame him as a rhetorician, and offers an alternative reading of his key discussion of rhetoric and of the rhetorical tradition in general. The conclusion argues that the reception of Bakhtin suggests a pattern in rhetorical studies. As rhetoricians encounter theorists who condemn rhetoric, they tend to defer the instrumental aspect of rhetoric, its potential for manipulation, in favor of a more benign view of rhetorical action. It is dangerous to disregard the danger of rhetoric in pursuit of a higher status for rhetoric.

AB - Over the course of the past decade, the work of Russian literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin has exerted an increasing influence in rhetorical studies. This essay explores the ways in which rhetorical scholars have embraced Mikhail Bakhtin as a rhetorical theorist in spite of the fact that he disdained rhetoric. The first section of the essay examines the concept of tradition, elucidates three definitions of the rhetorical tradition commonly available to theorists, and explains the processes through which these definitions articulate as rhetorical theorists even those people who attack rhetoric. The essay then turns to the rhetorical reception of Mikhail Bakhtin, critiques the strategies that frame him as a rhetorician, and offers an alternative reading of his key discussion of rhetoric and of the rhetorical tradition in general. The conclusion argues that the reception of Bakhtin suggests a pattern in rhetorical studies. As rhetoricians encounter theorists who condemn rhetoric, they tend to defer the instrumental aspect of rhetoric, its potential for manipulation, in favor of a more benign view of rhetorical action. It is dangerous to disregard the danger of rhetoric in pursuit of a higher status for rhetoric.

KW - History of rhetoric

KW - Mikhail Bakhtin

KW - Rhetorical criticism

KW - Rhetorical theory

KW - Rhetorical tradition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040030183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040030183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00335630109384336

DO - 10.1080/00335630109384336

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040030183

VL - 87

SP - 259

EP - 277

JO - Quarterly Journal of Speech

JF - Quarterly Journal of Speech

SN - 0033-5630

IS - 3

ER -