Microsatellites behaving badly

Empirical evaluation of genotyping errors and subsequent impacts on population studies

A. C. Kelly, Nohra E Mateus-Pinilla, M. Douglas, M. Douglas, P. Shelton, Jan E Novakofski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Microsatellites are useful tools for ecological studies because they can be used to discern population structure, dispersal patterns and genetic relationships among individuals. However, they can also yield inaccurate genotypes that, in turn, bias results, promote biological misinterpretations, and create repercussions for population management and conservation programs. We used empirical data from a large-scale microsatellite DNA study of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to identify sources of genotyping error, evaluate corrective measures, and provide recommendations to prevent bias in population studies. We detected unreported mutations that led to erroneous genotypes in five of 13 previously evaluated microsatellites. Of the five problematic markers, two contained mutations that resulted in null alleles, and three contained mutations that resulted in imperfect repeats. These five microsatellites had error rates that were four times greater on average than those observed in the remaining eight. Methodological corrections, such as primer redesign, reduced errors up to 5-fold in two problematic loci, although analytical corrections (computational adjustment for errors) were unable to fully prevent bias and, consequently, measures of genetic differentiation and kinship were negatively impacted. Our results demonstrate the importance of error evaluation during all stages of population studies, and emphasize the need to standardize procedures for microsatellite analyses. This study facilitates the application of microsatellite technology in population studies by examining common sources of genotyping error, identifying unreported problems with microsatellites, and offering solutions to prevent error and bias in population studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2534-2553
Number of pages20
JournalGenetics and Molecular Research
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 19 2011

Fingerprint

Microsatellite Repeats
Population
Mutation
Research Design
Genotype
Deer
Alleles
Technology
DNA

Keywords

  • Genotyping
  • Heterozygote deficiency
  • Microsatellite
  • Null alleles
  • Parentage
  • White-tailed deer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Cite this

Microsatellites behaving badly : Empirical evaluation of genotyping errors and subsequent impacts on population studies. / Kelly, A. C.; Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra E; Douglas, M.; Douglas, M.; Shelton, P.; Novakofski, Jan E.

In: Genetics and Molecular Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, 19.10.2011, p. 2534-2553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10ffe7c540b44cce889540bdf193147b,
title = "Microsatellites behaving badly: Empirical evaluation of genotyping errors and subsequent impacts on population studies",
abstract = "Microsatellites are useful tools for ecological studies because they can be used to discern population structure, dispersal patterns and genetic relationships among individuals. However, they can also yield inaccurate genotypes that, in turn, bias results, promote biological misinterpretations, and create repercussions for population management and conservation programs. We used empirical data from a large-scale microsatellite DNA study of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to identify sources of genotyping error, evaluate corrective measures, and provide recommendations to prevent bias in population studies. We detected unreported mutations that led to erroneous genotypes in five of 13 previously evaluated microsatellites. Of the five problematic markers, two contained mutations that resulted in null alleles, and three contained mutations that resulted in imperfect repeats. These five microsatellites had error rates that were four times greater on average than those observed in the remaining eight. Methodological corrections, such as primer redesign, reduced errors up to 5-fold in two problematic loci, although analytical corrections (computational adjustment for errors) were unable to fully prevent bias and, consequently, measures of genetic differentiation and kinship were negatively impacted. Our results demonstrate the importance of error evaluation during all stages of population studies, and emphasize the need to standardize procedures for microsatellite analyses. This study facilitates the application of microsatellite technology in population studies by examining common sources of genotyping error, identifying unreported problems with microsatellites, and offering solutions to prevent error and bias in population studies.",
keywords = "Genotyping, Heterozygote deficiency, Microsatellite, Null alleles, Parentage, White-tailed deer",
author = "Kelly, {A. C.} and Mateus-Pinilla, {Nohra E} and M. Douglas and M. Douglas and P. Shelton and Novakofski, {Jan E}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.4238/2011.October.19.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "2534--2553",
journal = "Genetics and Molecular Research",
issn = "1676-5680",
publisher = "Fundacao de Pesquisas Cientificas de Ribeirao Preto",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microsatellites behaving badly

T2 - Empirical evaluation of genotyping errors and subsequent impacts on population studies

AU - Kelly, A. C.

AU - Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra E

AU - Douglas, M.

AU - Douglas, M.

AU - Shelton, P.

AU - Novakofski, Jan E

PY - 2011/10/19

Y1 - 2011/10/19

N2 - Microsatellites are useful tools for ecological studies because they can be used to discern population structure, dispersal patterns and genetic relationships among individuals. However, they can also yield inaccurate genotypes that, in turn, bias results, promote biological misinterpretations, and create repercussions for population management and conservation programs. We used empirical data from a large-scale microsatellite DNA study of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to identify sources of genotyping error, evaluate corrective measures, and provide recommendations to prevent bias in population studies. We detected unreported mutations that led to erroneous genotypes in five of 13 previously evaluated microsatellites. Of the five problematic markers, two contained mutations that resulted in null alleles, and three contained mutations that resulted in imperfect repeats. These five microsatellites had error rates that were four times greater on average than those observed in the remaining eight. Methodological corrections, such as primer redesign, reduced errors up to 5-fold in two problematic loci, although analytical corrections (computational adjustment for errors) were unable to fully prevent bias and, consequently, measures of genetic differentiation and kinship were negatively impacted. Our results demonstrate the importance of error evaluation during all stages of population studies, and emphasize the need to standardize procedures for microsatellite analyses. This study facilitates the application of microsatellite technology in population studies by examining common sources of genotyping error, identifying unreported problems with microsatellites, and offering solutions to prevent error and bias in population studies.

AB - Microsatellites are useful tools for ecological studies because they can be used to discern population structure, dispersal patterns and genetic relationships among individuals. However, they can also yield inaccurate genotypes that, in turn, bias results, promote biological misinterpretations, and create repercussions for population management and conservation programs. We used empirical data from a large-scale microsatellite DNA study of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to identify sources of genotyping error, evaluate corrective measures, and provide recommendations to prevent bias in population studies. We detected unreported mutations that led to erroneous genotypes in five of 13 previously evaluated microsatellites. Of the five problematic markers, two contained mutations that resulted in null alleles, and three contained mutations that resulted in imperfect repeats. These five microsatellites had error rates that were four times greater on average than those observed in the remaining eight. Methodological corrections, such as primer redesign, reduced errors up to 5-fold in two problematic loci, although analytical corrections (computational adjustment for errors) were unable to fully prevent bias and, consequently, measures of genetic differentiation and kinship were negatively impacted. Our results demonstrate the importance of error evaluation during all stages of population studies, and emphasize the need to standardize procedures for microsatellite analyses. This study facilitates the application of microsatellite technology in population studies by examining common sources of genotyping error, identifying unreported problems with microsatellites, and offering solutions to prevent error and bias in population studies.

KW - Genotyping

KW - Heterozygote deficiency

KW - Microsatellite

KW - Null alleles

KW - Parentage

KW - White-tailed deer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856429802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856429802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4238/2011.October.19.1

DO - 10.4238/2011.October.19.1

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 2534

EP - 2553

JO - Genetics and Molecular Research

JF - Genetics and Molecular Research

SN - 1676-5680

IS - 4

ER -