Abstract
The United States Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE-NETL) is developing a volumetricbased methodology for calculating prospective CO2 storage resource of organic-rich shale formations. Similar to natural gas, carbon dioxide (CO2) can be stored in organic-rich shale as free-gas within fractures and pores and as a sorbed component on organic matter and clays. The proposed methodology includes three screening criteria to serve as guidelines for assessing CO2 storage. The absence of thorough, comprehensive geologic and petrophysical data for unconventional shale reservoirs is noted as a significant limitation and source of uncertainty in estimating CO2 storage resource. Future work is aimed towards analyzing geologic data from organic-rich shale in order to refine the methodology and reduce the uncertainty associated with CO2 storage in these complex formations.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5178-5184 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Energy Procedia |
| Volume | 63 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2014 |
| Event | 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2014 - Austin, United States Duration: Oct 5 2014 → Oct 9 2014 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- CO storage
- Shale
- Storage capacity
- Storage resource
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Energy(all)
Cite this
Methodology for assessing CO2 storage potential of organic-rich shale formations. / Goodman, Angela; Fukai, Isis; Dilmore, Robert; Frailey, Scott; Bromhal, Grant; Soeder, Dan; Gorecki, Charlie; Peck, Wesley; Rodosta, Traci; Guthrie, George.
In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 63, 01.01.2014, p. 5178-5184.Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodology for assessing CO2 storage potential of organic-rich shale formations
AU - Goodman, Angela
AU - Fukai, Isis
AU - Dilmore, Robert
AU - Frailey, Scott
AU - Bromhal, Grant
AU - Soeder, Dan
AU - Gorecki, Charlie
AU - Peck, Wesley
AU - Rodosta, Traci
AU - Guthrie, George
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - The United States Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE-NETL) is developing a volumetricbased methodology for calculating prospective CO2 storage resource of organic-rich shale formations. Similar to natural gas, carbon dioxide (CO2) can be stored in organic-rich shale as free-gas within fractures and pores and as a sorbed component on organic matter and clays. The proposed methodology includes three screening criteria to serve as guidelines for assessing CO2 storage. The absence of thorough, comprehensive geologic and petrophysical data for unconventional shale reservoirs is noted as a significant limitation and source of uncertainty in estimating CO2 storage resource. Future work is aimed towards analyzing geologic data from organic-rich shale in order to refine the methodology and reduce the uncertainty associated with CO2 storage in these complex formations.
AB - The United States Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE-NETL) is developing a volumetricbased methodology for calculating prospective CO2 storage resource of organic-rich shale formations. Similar to natural gas, carbon dioxide (CO2) can be stored in organic-rich shale as free-gas within fractures and pores and as a sorbed component on organic matter and clays. The proposed methodology includes three screening criteria to serve as guidelines for assessing CO2 storage. The absence of thorough, comprehensive geologic and petrophysical data for unconventional shale reservoirs is noted as a significant limitation and source of uncertainty in estimating CO2 storage resource. Future work is aimed towards analyzing geologic data from organic-rich shale in order to refine the methodology and reduce the uncertainty associated with CO2 storage in these complex formations.
KW - CO storage
KW - Shale
KW - Storage capacity
KW - Storage resource
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922880638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922880638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.548
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.548
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84922880638
VL - 63
SP - 5178
EP - 5184
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
SN - 1876-6102
ER -