Method choice: Five discussant commentaries

Jennifer Caroline Greene, Mark W. Lipsey, Thomas A Schwandt, Nick L. Smith, Roland G. Tharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-127
Number of pages17
JournalNew Directions for Evaluation
Volume2007
Issue number113
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

dialogue
evaluation
evidence
Evaluator
Evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Method choice : Five discussant commentaries. / Greene, Jennifer Caroline; Lipsey, Mark W.; Schwandt, Thomas A; Smith, Nick L.; Tharp, Roland G.

In: New Directions for Evaluation, Vol. 2007, No. 113, 01.01.2007, p. 111-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greene, Jennifer Caroline ; Lipsey, Mark W. ; Schwandt, Thomas A ; Smith, Nick L. ; Tharp, Roland G. / Method choice : Five discussant commentaries. In: New Directions for Evaluation. 2007 ; Vol. 2007, No. 113. pp. 111-127.
@article{beeb5f3dcadc457a95ebdcdfd3da2119,
title = "Method choice: Five discussant commentaries",
abstract = "Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.",
author = "Greene, {Jennifer Caroline} and Lipsey, {Mark W.} and Schwandt, {Thomas A} and Smith, {Nick L.} and Tharp, {Roland G.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ev.218",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2007",
pages = "111--127",
journal = "New Directions for Evaluation",
issn = "1097-6736",
publisher = "Jossey-Bass Inc.",
number = "113",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Method choice

T2 - Five discussant commentaries

AU - Greene, Jennifer Caroline

AU - Lipsey, Mark W.

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A

AU - Smith, Nick L.

AU - Tharp, Roland G.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.

AB - Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence about methods choice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249149165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51249149165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ev.218

DO - 10.1002/ev.218

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:51249149165

VL - 2007

SP - 111

EP - 127

JO - New Directions for Evaluation

JF - New Directions for Evaluation

SN - 1097-6736

IS - 113

ER -