Metacommunity assembly and sorting in newly formed lake communities

Michael R. Allen, Jessica N. VanDyke, Carla E. Cáceres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When new habitats are created, community assembly may follow independent trajectories, since the relative importance of dispersal limitation, priority effects, species interactions, and environmental gradients can vary as assembly proceeds. Unfortunately, tracking community colonization and composition across decades is challenging. We compiled a multiyear community composition data set and reconstructed past communities with remains from sediment cores to investigate cladoceran assembly dynamics in six older (1920s) and two more recently formed (1950s) lakes. We found that current communities cluster along a gradient of thermal stratification that is known to influence predation intensity. Assembling communities showed evidence for a greater influence of species sorting and a reduced influence of spatial structure since the first colonizations. However, lake community trajectories varied considerably, reflecting different colonization sequences among lakes. In the older lakes, small-bodied cladocerans often arrived much earlier than large-bodied cladocerans, while the two younger lakes were colonized much more rapidly, and one was quickly dominated by a large-bodied species. Thus, by combining contemporary community data with paleoecological records, we show that assembly history influences natural community structure for decades while patterns of ecological sorting develop.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-275
Number of pages7
JournalEcology
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Keywords

  • Colonization
  • Community dissimilarity
  • Daphnia
  • Paleoecology
  • Spatial structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Metacommunity assembly and sorting in newly formed lake communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this