Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Until recently, the general belief was that non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) were healthy sugar substitutes because they provide sweet taste without calories or glycemic effects. However, data from several epidemiological studies have found that consumption of NNSs, mainly in diet sodas, is associated with increased risk to develop obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. The main purpose of this article is to review recent scientific evidence supporting potential mechanisms that explain how "metabolically inactive" NNSs, which have few, if any, calories, might promote metabolic dysregulation. Three potential mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive, are presented: 1) NNSs interfere with learned responses that contribute to control glucose and energy homeostasis, 2) NNSs interfere with gut microbiota and induce glucose intolerance, and 3) NNSs interact with sweet-taste receptors expressed throughout the digestive system that play a role in glucose absorption and trigger insulin secretion. In addition, recent findings from our laboratory showing an association between individual taste sensitivity to detect sucralose and sucralose's acute effects on metabolic response to an oral glucose load are reported. Taken as a whole, data support the notion that NNSs have metabolic effects. More research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which NNSs may drive metabolic dysregulation and better understand potential effects of these commonly used food additives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)450-455
Number of pages6
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume152
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Non-Nutritive Sweeteners
trichlorosucrose
Glucose
Sweetening Agents
Digestive System
Food Additives
Glucose Intolerance
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Epidemiologic Studies
Homeostasis
Obesity
Insulin

Keywords

  • Artificial sweeteners
  • Glycemic control
  • Intense sweeteners
  • Metabolism
  • Non-caloric sweeteners
  • Sucralose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners. / Pepino de Gruev, Marta Yanina.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 152, 01.12.2015, p. 450-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{416b98ff3093414e9e4c3df87b23c12a,
title = "Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners",
abstract = "Until recently, the general belief was that non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) were healthy sugar substitutes because they provide sweet taste without calories or glycemic effects. However, data from several epidemiological studies have found that consumption of NNSs, mainly in diet sodas, is associated with increased risk to develop obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. The main purpose of this article is to review recent scientific evidence supporting potential mechanisms that explain how {"}metabolically inactive{"} NNSs, which have few, if any, calories, might promote metabolic dysregulation. Three potential mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive, are presented: 1) NNSs interfere with learned responses that contribute to control glucose and energy homeostasis, 2) NNSs interfere with gut microbiota and induce glucose intolerance, and 3) NNSs interact with sweet-taste receptors expressed throughout the digestive system that play a role in glucose absorption and trigger insulin secretion. In addition, recent findings from our laboratory showing an association between individual taste sensitivity to detect sucralose and sucralose's acute effects on metabolic response to an oral glucose load are reported. Taken as a whole, data support the notion that NNSs have metabolic effects. More research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which NNSs may drive metabolic dysregulation and better understand potential effects of these commonly used food additives.",
keywords = "Artificial sweeteners, Glycemic control, Intense sweeteners, Metabolism, Non-caloric sweeteners, Sucralose",
author = "{Pepino de Gruev}, {Marta Yanina}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "450--455",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners

AU - Pepino de Gruev, Marta Yanina

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Until recently, the general belief was that non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) were healthy sugar substitutes because they provide sweet taste without calories or glycemic effects. However, data from several epidemiological studies have found that consumption of NNSs, mainly in diet sodas, is associated with increased risk to develop obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. The main purpose of this article is to review recent scientific evidence supporting potential mechanisms that explain how "metabolically inactive" NNSs, which have few, if any, calories, might promote metabolic dysregulation. Three potential mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive, are presented: 1) NNSs interfere with learned responses that contribute to control glucose and energy homeostasis, 2) NNSs interfere with gut microbiota and induce glucose intolerance, and 3) NNSs interact with sweet-taste receptors expressed throughout the digestive system that play a role in glucose absorption and trigger insulin secretion. In addition, recent findings from our laboratory showing an association between individual taste sensitivity to detect sucralose and sucralose's acute effects on metabolic response to an oral glucose load are reported. Taken as a whole, data support the notion that NNSs have metabolic effects. More research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which NNSs may drive metabolic dysregulation and better understand potential effects of these commonly used food additives.

AB - Until recently, the general belief was that non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) were healthy sugar substitutes because they provide sweet taste without calories or glycemic effects. However, data from several epidemiological studies have found that consumption of NNSs, mainly in diet sodas, is associated with increased risk to develop obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. The main purpose of this article is to review recent scientific evidence supporting potential mechanisms that explain how "metabolically inactive" NNSs, which have few, if any, calories, might promote metabolic dysregulation. Three potential mechanisms, which are not mutually exclusive, are presented: 1) NNSs interfere with learned responses that contribute to control glucose and energy homeostasis, 2) NNSs interfere with gut microbiota and induce glucose intolerance, and 3) NNSs interact with sweet-taste receptors expressed throughout the digestive system that play a role in glucose absorption and trigger insulin secretion. In addition, recent findings from our laboratory showing an association between individual taste sensitivity to detect sucralose and sucralose's acute effects on metabolic response to an oral glucose load are reported. Taken as a whole, data support the notion that NNSs have metabolic effects. More research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which NNSs may drive metabolic dysregulation and better understand potential effects of these commonly used food additives.

KW - Artificial sweeteners

KW - Glycemic control

KW - Intense sweeteners

KW - Metabolism

KW - Non-caloric sweeteners

KW - Sucralose

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961175137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961175137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.024

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26095119

AN - SCOPUS:84961175137

VL - 152

SP - 450

EP - 455

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

ER -