Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process

Alyce M. Nogal, Deborah L. Thurston, Yun Q. Tian

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Design expert systems include heuristics which combine technical engineering expertise with necessary assumptions for evaluating alternatives during the iterative design process. These assumptions might be reasonable, but become less useful as the design evolves and progressively more precise tradeoff choices must be made. This paper presents a method for construction of an expert system which treats expertise in formal decision theory with the same respect accorded to technical domain expertise. A quantitative assessment of the end-user's preferences is used in merit-level decision rules which direct the design process. An automotive material selection example is presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages127-136
Number of pages10
StatePublished - Dec 1 1994
EventProceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition - Chicago, IL, USA
Duration: Nov 6 1994Nov 11 1994

Other

OtherProceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
CityChicago, IL, USA
Period11/6/9411/11/94

Fingerprint

Expert systems
Decision theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Nogal, A. M., Thurston, D. L., & Tian, Y. Q. (1994). Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process. 127-136. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, USA, .

Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process. / Nogal, Alyce M.; Thurston, Deborah L.; Tian, Yun Q.

1994. 127-136 Paper presented at Proceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, USA, .

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Nogal, AM, Thurston, DL & Tian, YQ 1994, 'Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process', Paper presented at Proceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, USA, 11/6/94 - 11/11/94 pp. 127-136.
Nogal AM, Thurston DL, Tian YQ. Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process. 1994. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, USA, .
Nogal, Alyce M. ; Thurston, Deborah L. ; Tian, Yun Q. / Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, USA, .10 p.
@conference{b0a6eca1de914e26ba17aff2dc3307c8,
title = "Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process",
abstract = "Design expert systems include heuristics which combine technical engineering expertise with necessary assumptions for evaluating alternatives during the iterative design process. These assumptions might be reasonable, but become less useful as the design evolves and progressively more precise tradeoff choices must be made. This paper presents a method for construction of an expert system which treats expertise in formal decision theory with the same respect accorded to technical domain expertise. A quantitative assessment of the end-user's preferences is used in merit-level decision rules which direct the design process. An automotive material selection example is presented.",
author = "Nogal, {Alyce M.} and Thurston, {Deborah L.} and Tian, {Yun Q.}",
year = "1994",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "127--136",
note = "Proceedings of the 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition ; Conference date: 06-11-1994 Through 11-11-1994",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Meta-level reasoning in the iterative design process

AU - Nogal, Alyce M.

AU - Thurston, Deborah L.

AU - Tian, Yun Q.

PY - 1994/12/1

Y1 - 1994/12/1

N2 - Design expert systems include heuristics which combine technical engineering expertise with necessary assumptions for evaluating alternatives during the iterative design process. These assumptions might be reasonable, but become less useful as the design evolves and progressively more precise tradeoff choices must be made. This paper presents a method for construction of an expert system which treats expertise in formal decision theory with the same respect accorded to technical domain expertise. A quantitative assessment of the end-user's preferences is used in merit-level decision rules which direct the design process. An automotive material selection example is presented.

AB - Design expert systems include heuristics which combine technical engineering expertise with necessary assumptions for evaluating alternatives during the iterative design process. These assumptions might be reasonable, but become less useful as the design evolves and progressively more precise tradeoff choices must be made. This paper presents a method for construction of an expert system which treats expertise in formal decision theory with the same respect accorded to technical domain expertise. A quantitative assessment of the end-user's preferences is used in merit-level decision rules which direct the design process. An automotive material selection example is presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028752891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028752891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:0028752891

SP - 127

EP - 136

ER -