Mentoring Matters: An Exploratory Survey of Educational Leadership Doctoral Students’ Perspectives

Anjale Devawn Welton, Katherine Cumings Mansfield, Pei Ling Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is limited research on quantitative differences between men and women’s experiences in doctoral programs. We aim to fill that gap by sharing findings from a web-based exploratory survey of perceived gender differences on quality mentoring in educational leadership doctoral programs. According to survey results, there is limited statistical significance in terms of gender differences in programmatic supports and scholarly progress. However, women experience feelings of self-doubt due to negative experiences with advising and mentoring, including difficulties making connections to a quality mentor. Furthermore, both female and male participants shared common definitions of what constitutes quality mentorship and believed mentorship was important, but lacking in varying degrees. Finally, all participants agreed that their educational leadership preparation programs should provide additional support in terms of writing and research development. Participants also shared important recommendations for strengthening mentoring experiences as well as future research methods and foci.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)481-509
Number of pages29
JournalMentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 20 2014

Fingerprint

mentoring
leadership
gender-specific factors
experience
student
statistical significance
research and development

Keywords

  • doctoral students
  • educational leadership
  • exploratory survey
  • gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Mentoring Matters : An Exploratory Survey of Educational Leadership Doctoral Students’ Perspectives. / Welton, Anjale Devawn; Mansfield, Katherine Cumings; Lee, Pei Ling.

In: Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, Vol. 22, No. 5, 20.10.2014, p. 481-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1f9ca5c2fd134a3c9c46f4eacd347658,
title = "Mentoring Matters: An Exploratory Survey of Educational Leadership Doctoral Students’ Perspectives",
abstract = "There is limited research on quantitative differences between men and women’s experiences in doctoral programs. We aim to fill that gap by sharing findings from a web-based exploratory survey of perceived gender differences on quality mentoring in educational leadership doctoral programs. According to survey results, there is limited statistical significance in terms of gender differences in programmatic supports and scholarly progress. However, women experience feelings of self-doubt due to negative experiences with advising and mentoring, including difficulties making connections to a quality mentor. Furthermore, both female and male participants shared common definitions of what constitutes quality mentorship and believed mentorship was important, but lacking in varying degrees. Finally, all participants agreed that their educational leadership preparation programs should provide additional support in terms of writing and research development. Participants also shared important recommendations for strengthening mentoring experiences as well as future research methods and foci.",
keywords = "doctoral students, educational leadership, exploratory survey, gender",
author = "Welton, {Anjale Devawn} and Mansfield, {Katherine Cumings} and Lee, {Pei Ling}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/13611267.2014.983330",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "481--509",
journal = "Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning",
issn = "1361-1267",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentoring Matters

T2 - An Exploratory Survey of Educational Leadership Doctoral Students’ Perspectives

AU - Welton, Anjale Devawn

AU - Mansfield, Katherine Cumings

AU - Lee, Pei Ling

PY - 2014/10/20

Y1 - 2014/10/20

N2 - There is limited research on quantitative differences between men and women’s experiences in doctoral programs. We aim to fill that gap by sharing findings from a web-based exploratory survey of perceived gender differences on quality mentoring in educational leadership doctoral programs. According to survey results, there is limited statistical significance in terms of gender differences in programmatic supports and scholarly progress. However, women experience feelings of self-doubt due to negative experiences with advising and mentoring, including difficulties making connections to a quality mentor. Furthermore, both female and male participants shared common definitions of what constitutes quality mentorship and believed mentorship was important, but lacking in varying degrees. Finally, all participants agreed that their educational leadership preparation programs should provide additional support in terms of writing and research development. Participants also shared important recommendations for strengthening mentoring experiences as well as future research methods and foci.

AB - There is limited research on quantitative differences between men and women’s experiences in doctoral programs. We aim to fill that gap by sharing findings from a web-based exploratory survey of perceived gender differences on quality mentoring in educational leadership doctoral programs. According to survey results, there is limited statistical significance in terms of gender differences in programmatic supports and scholarly progress. However, women experience feelings of self-doubt due to negative experiences with advising and mentoring, including difficulties making connections to a quality mentor. Furthermore, both female and male participants shared common definitions of what constitutes quality mentorship and believed mentorship was important, but lacking in varying degrees. Finally, all participants agreed that their educational leadership preparation programs should provide additional support in terms of writing and research development. Participants also shared important recommendations for strengthening mentoring experiences as well as future research methods and foci.

KW - doctoral students

KW - educational leadership

KW - exploratory survey

KW - gender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919865498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919865498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13611267.2014.983330

DO - 10.1080/13611267.2014.983330

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84919865498

VL - 22

SP - 481

EP - 509

JO - Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning

JF - Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning

SN - 1361-1267

IS - 5

ER -