TY - JOUR
T1 - MEM-EX
T2 - An exemplar memory model of decisions from experience
AU - Hotaling, Jared M.
AU - Donkin, Chris
AU - Jarvstad, Andreas
AU - Newell, Ben R.
N1 - Funding Information:
JMH, CD, and BRN were supported by the Australian Research Council (DP160101186). AJ was supported by a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship (PF150005). We thank Jake Embrey, Garston Liang, and Dominic Tran for help with data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Many real-world decisions must be made on basis of experienced outcomes. However, there is little consensus about the mechanisms by which people make these decisions from experience (DfE). Across five experiments, we identified several factors influencing DfE. We also introduce a novel computational modeling framework, the memory for exemplars model (MEM-EX), which posits that decision makers rely on memory for previously experienced outcomes to make choices. Using MEM-EX, we demonstrate how cognitive mechanisms provide intuitive and parsimonious explanations for the effects of value-ignorance, salience, outcome order, and sample size. We also conduct a cross-validation analysis of several models within the MEM-EX framework. We compare these to three alternative models; two baseline models built on the principle of expected value maximization, and another employing a suite of choice methods previously shown to perform well in prediction tournaments. We find that MEM-EX consistently outperforms these competitors, demonstrating its value as a tool for making quantitative predictions without overfitting. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the interplay between attention, memory, and experience-based choice.
AB - Many real-world decisions must be made on basis of experienced outcomes. However, there is little consensus about the mechanisms by which people make these decisions from experience (DfE). Across five experiments, we identified several factors influencing DfE. We also introduce a novel computational modeling framework, the memory for exemplars model (MEM-EX), which posits that decision makers rely on memory for previously experienced outcomes to make choices. Using MEM-EX, we demonstrate how cognitive mechanisms provide intuitive and parsimonious explanations for the effects of value-ignorance, salience, outcome order, and sample size. We also conduct a cross-validation analysis of several models within the MEM-EX framework. We compare these to three alternative models; two baseline models built on the principle of expected value maximization, and another employing a suite of choice methods previously shown to perform well in prediction tournaments. We find that MEM-EX consistently outperforms these competitors, demonstrating its value as a tool for making quantitative predictions without overfitting. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the interplay between attention, memory, and experience-based choice.
KW - BEAST
KW - Cognitive mechanisms
KW - Computational models
KW - Decision making
KW - Decisions from experience
KW - Exemplar memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138059422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138059422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31234/osf.io/fjhr9
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/fjhr9
M3 - Article
C2 - 36116240
AN - SCOPUS:85138059422
SN - 0010-0285
VL - 138
JO - Cognitive Psychology
JF - Cognitive Psychology
M1 - 101517
ER -