Measuring Generality and Social Validity in Single Case Research

Joseph M Lambert, Hedda Meadan-Kaplansky, Jennifer R Ledford

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In their seminal paper, Baer et al. (1968) described seven dimensions of behavioral research. Two important qualities were (1) outcomes of such work should possess generality—behavior change which persists following treatment termination, at the times and in the locations in which such change is needed; and should be (2) applied—dependent variables targeted for change should be socially important. Soon after, the concept of social validity, or “the extent to which all the consumers of an intervention like it” (p. 322; Baer et al., 1987), was identified as being important for single case research in the behavioral sciences (e.g., Baer et al., 1987; Kazdin, 1977; Wolf, 1978). The purpose of this chapter is to: (1) introduce each of these concepts, (2) describe how they have historically been measured and studied, (3) highlight challenges to their valid assessment, and (4) propose methods through which they might be studied, in the service of a technology of generality and social validity.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSingle Case Research Methodology
Subtitle of host publicationApplications in Special Education and Behavioral Sciences
EditorsJennifer R Ledford, David L Gast
PublisherRoutledge
Pages96-117
Edition4
ISBN (Electronic)9781003294726
ISBN (Print)9781032279312, 9781032265810
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Generality and Social Validity in Single Case Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this